BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29685818)

  • 1. Strategies for In Vivo Genome Editing in Nondividing Cells.
    Nami F; Basiri M; Satarian L; Curtiss C; Baharvand H; Verfaillie C
    Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Aug; 36(8):770-786. PubMed ID: 29685818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. INDEL detection, the 'Achilles heel' of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels.
    Bennett EP; Petersen BL; Johansen IE; Niu Y; Yang Z; Chamberlain CA; Met Ö; Wandall HH; Frödin M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Dec; 48(21):11958-11981. PubMed ID: 33170255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designed nucleases for targeted genome editing.
    Lee J; Chung JH; Kim HM; Kim DW; Kim H
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2016 Feb; 14(2):448-62. PubMed ID: 26369767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gene Editing With TALEN and CRISPR/Cas in Rice.
    Bi H; Yang B
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2017; 149():81-98. PubMed ID: 28712502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The democratization of gene editing: Insights from site-specific cleavage and double-strand break repair.
    Jasin M; Haber JE
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2016 Aug; 44():6-16. PubMed ID: 27261202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Precise Genome Modification via Sequence-Specific Nucleases-Mediated Gene Targeting for Crop Improvement.
    Sun Y; Li J; Xia L
    Front Plant Sci; 2016; 7():1928. PubMed ID: 28066481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods Favoring Homology-Directed Repair Choice in Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Induced-Double Strand Breaks.
    Yang H; Ren S; Yu S; Pan H; Li T; Ge S; Zhang J; Xia N
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 32899704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ectopic expression of RAD52 and dn53BP1 improves homology-directed repair during CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.
    Paulsen BS; Mandal PK; Frock RL; Boyraz B; Yadav R; Upadhyayula S; Gutierrez-Martinez P; Ebina W; Fasth A; Kirchhausen T; Talkowski ME; Agarwal S; Alt FW; Rossi DJ
    Nat Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 1(11):878-888. PubMed ID: 31015609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-Homologous End Joining and Homology Directed DNA Repair Frequency of Double-Stranded Breaks Introduced by Genome Editing Reagents.
    Zaboikin M; Zaboikina T; Freter C; Srinivasakumar N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169931. PubMed ID: 28095454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TALEN-Mediated Homologous Recombination Produces Site-Directed DNA Base Change and Herbicide-Resistant Rice.
    Li T; Liu B; Chen CY; Yang B
    J Genet Genomics; 2016 May; 43(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 27180265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of genome editing technologies to the study and treatment of hematological disease.
    Pellagatti A; Dolatshad H; Yip BH; Valletta S; Boultwood J
    Adv Biol Regul; 2016 Jan; 60():122-134. PubMed ID: 26433620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental history and application of CRISPR in human disease.
    Liang P; Zhang X; Chen Y; Huang J
    J Gene Med; 2017 Jun; 19(6-7):. PubMed ID: 28623876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The zebrafish genome editing toolkit.
    Ata H; Clark KJ; Ekker SC
    Methods Cell Biol; 2016; 135():149-70. PubMed ID: 27443924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A history of genome editing in mammals.
    Fernández A; Josa S; Montoliu L
    Mamm Genome; 2017 Aug; 28(7-8):237-246. PubMed ID: 28589393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-Strand Annealing Plays a Major Role in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair following CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage in
    Zhang WW; Matlashewski G
    mSphere; 2019 Aug; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31434745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining.
    Maruyama T; Dougan SK; Truttmann MC; Bilate AM; Ingram JR; Ploegh HL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 May; 33(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 25798939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Versatile and precise gene-targeting strategies for functional studies in mammalian cell lines.
    Wassef M; Luscan A; Battistella A; Le Corre S; Li H; Wallace MR; Vidaud M; Margueron R
    Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():45-54. PubMed ID: 28499832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated correction of human genetic disease.
    Men K; Duan X; He Z; Yang Y; Yao S; Wei Y
    Sci China Life Sci; 2017 May; 60(5):447-457. PubMed ID: 28534256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene editing using ssODNs with engineered endonucleases.
    Chen F; Pruett-Miller SM; Davis GD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1239():251-65. PubMed ID: 25408411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting CRISPR/Cas-mediated crop improvement: Special focus on nutrition.
    Kaul T; Sony SK; Verma R; Motelb KFA; Prakash AT; Eswaran M; Bharti J; Nehra M; Kaul R
    J Biosci; 2020; 45():. PubMed ID: 33361628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.