These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29686063)

  • 1. Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States.
    Sanchez DL; Johnson N; McCoy ST; Turner PA; Mach KJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(19):4875-4880. PubMed ID: 29686063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States.
    Baik E; Sanchez DL; Turner PA; Mach KJ; Field CB; Benson SM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(13):3290-3295. PubMed ID: 29531081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
    Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Market Potential for CO
    Wong J; Santoso J; Went M; Sanchez D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Apr; 56(7):4305-4316. PubMed ID: 35255216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infrastructure to enable deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage in the United States.
    Edwards RWJ; Celia MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(38):E8815-E8824. PubMed ID: 30181267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
    Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biorefineries of carbon dioxide: From carbon capture and storage (CCS) to bioenergies production.
    Cheah WY; Ling TC; Juan JC; Lee DJ; Chang JS; Show PL
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 215():346-356. PubMed ID: 27090405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Policy Analysis of CO
    Leonhardt BE; Tyson RJ; Taw E; Went MS; Sanchez DL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Aug; 57(31):11401-11409. PubMed ID: 37494599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technoeconomic Analysis of Negative Emissions Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage through Pyrolysis and Bioenergy District Heating Infrastructure.
    Lim TC; Cuellar A; Langseth K; Waldon JL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(3):1875-1884. PubMed ID: 35015535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost Analysis of Direct Air Capture and Sequestration Coupled to Low-Carbon Thermal Energy in the United States.
    McQueen N; Psarras P; Pilorgé H; Liguori S; He J; Yuan M; Woodall CM; Kian K; Pierpoint L; Jurewicz J; Lucas JM; Jacobson R; Deich N; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 54(12):7542-7551. PubMed ID: 32412237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carbon-Negative Biofuel Production.
    Kim S; Zhang X; Reddy AD; Dale BE; Thelen KD; Jones CD; Izaurralde RC; Runge T; Maravelias C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Sep; 54(17):10797-10807. PubMed ID: 32786588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.
    Anderson JJ; Rode DC; Zhai H; Fischbeck PS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(16):11162-11171. PubMed ID: 35926127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act on the Economics of Clean Hydrogen and Synthetic Liquid Fuels.
    Cheng F; Luo H; Jenkins JD; Larson ED
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 57(41):15336-15347. PubMed ID: 37647613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries.
    Yang M; Baral NR; Anastasopoulou A; Breunig HM; Scown CD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(20):12810-12819. PubMed ID: 33030339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration of Process Emissions from the U.S. Industrial Sector.
    Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Maynard D; Psarras P; He J; Rufael T; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 54(12):7524-7532. PubMed ID: 32432460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electricity from fossil fuels without CO2 emissions: assessing the costs of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in U.S. electricity markets.
    Johnson TL; Keith DW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1452-9. PubMed ID: 11686250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can biomass supply meet the demands of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)?
    Jones MB; Albanito F
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Oct; 26(10):5358-5364. PubMed ID: 32726492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wood Vault: remove atmospheric CO
    Zeng N; Hausmann H
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2022 Apr; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 35362755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.