These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29686063)
21. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage. Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost and Life Cycle Emissions of Ethanol Produced with an Oxyfuel Boiler and Carbon Capture and Storage. Dees J; Oke K; Goldstein H; McCoy ST; Sanchez DL; Simon AJ; Li W Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Apr; 57(13):5391-5403. PubMed ID: 36943504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Rao AB; Rubin ES Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Oct; 36(20):4467-75. PubMed ID: 12387425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO Edmonds J; Nichols C; Adamantiades M; Bistline J; Huster J; Iyer G; Johnson N; Patel P; Showalter S; Victor N; Waldhoff S; Wise M; Wood F Energy Policy; 2020; 146():. PubMed ID: 35444362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimal bioenergy power generation for climate change mitigation with or without carbon sequestration. Woolf D; Lehmann J; Lee DR Nat Commun; 2016 Oct; 7():13160. PubMed ID: 27767177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme. Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Deciding between carbon trading and carbon capture and sequestration: an optimisation-based case study for methanol synthesis from syngas. Üçtuğ FG; Ağralı S; Arıkan Y; Avcıoğlu E J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():1-8. PubMed ID: 24246850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management. Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Geo-Spatial Economic Assessment of the Potential Development of Bioenergy Combined with Direct Air Carbon Capture (BEDAC) in the USA. Favero A; Realff M; Lucas M; Giarrusso A; Lang K Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Dec; 57(51):21681-21690. PubMed ID: 38082479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R; Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Porous materials for carbon dioxide separations. Siegelman RL; Kim EJ; Long JR Nat Mater; 2021 Aug; 20(8):1060-1072. PubMed ID: 34321657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Empirical Evidence for the Potential Climate Benefits of Decarbonizing Light Vehicle Transport in the U.S. with Bioenergy from Purpose-Grown Biomass with and without BECCS. Gelfand I; Hamilton SK; Kravchenko AN; Jackson RD; Thelen KD; Robertson GP Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Mar; 54(5):2961-2974. PubMed ID: 32052964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector. Psarras PC; Comello S; Bains P; Charoensawadpong P; Reichelstein S; Wilcox J Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Oct; 51(19):11440-11449. PubMed ID: 28858476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments. Haszeldine RS; Flude S; Johnson G; Scott V Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2018 May; 376(2119):. PubMed ID: 29610379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Direct Air Capture of CO Su J; Teng HH; Wan X; Zhang J; Liu CQ Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mesoscale carbon sequestration site screening and CCS infrastructure analysis. Keating GN; Middleton RS; Stauffer PH; Viswanathan HS; Letellier BC; Pasqualini D; Pawar RJ; Wolfsberg AV Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 20698546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of Direct Air Capture Integrated with Wind Energy and Enhanced Oil Recovery. Datta A; Krishnamoorti R Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 57(5):2084-2092. PubMed ID: 36692891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modeling Ecological Constraints on a CO Shih JS; Chen B; Thompson AL; Krupnick A; Livingston D; Pratt R; Pawar R Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 57(43):16255-16264. PubMed ID: 37856836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites. Dai Z; Viswanathan H; Middleton R; Pan F; Ampomah W; Yang C; Jia W; Xiao T; Lee SY; McPherson B; Balch R; Grigg R; White M Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7546-54. PubMed ID: 27362472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]