These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29686100)

  • 1. Genetic instrumental variable regression: Explaining socioeconomic and health outcomes in nonexperimental data.
    DiPrete TA; Burik CAP; Koellinger PD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(22):E4970-E4979. PubMed ID: 29686100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
    van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Bowden J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1985-1998. PubMed ID: 29040600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
    Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome.
    Greco M FD; Minelli C; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(21):2926-40. PubMed ID: 25950993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mendelian Randomization.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; Stein CM; Ziegler A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():581-628. PubMed ID: 28980266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting and correcting for bias in Mendelian randomization analyses using Gene-by-Environment interactions.
    Spiller W; Slichter D; Bowden J; Davey Smith G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 48(3):702-712. PubMed ID: 30462199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic instrumental variable analysis: time to call mendelian randomization what it is. The example of alcohol and cardiovascular disease.
    Mukamal KJ; Stampfer MJ; Rimm EB
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 35(2):93-97. PubMed ID: 31761964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of causal genes at GWAS loci with pleiotropic gene regulatory effects using sets of correlated instrumental variables.
    Khan M; Ludl AA; Bankier S; Björkegren JL; Michoel T
    ArXiv; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38259344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRCIP: a robust Mendelian randomization method accounting for correlated and idiosyncratic pleiotropy.
    Xu S; Fung WK; Liu Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33704372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR-LDP: a two-sample Mendelian randomization for GWAS summary statistics accounting for linkage disequilibrium and horizontal pleiotropy.
    Cheng Q; Yang Y; Shi X; Yeung KF; Yang C; Peng H; Liu J
    NAR Genom Bioinform; 2020 Jun; 2(2):lqaa028. PubMed ID: 33575584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization with multiple pleiotropic variants.
    Berzuini C; Guo H; Burgess S; Bernardinelli L
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):86-101. PubMed ID: 30084873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
    Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization.
    Davies NM; von Hinke Kessler Scholder S; Farbmacher H; Burgess S; Windmeijer F; Smith GD
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 25382280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comprehensive gene-centric pleiotropic association analysis for 14 psychiatric disorders with GWAS summary statistics.
    Lu H; Qiao J; Shao Z; Wang T; Huang S; Zeng P
    BMC Med; 2021 Dec; 19(1):314. PubMed ID: 34895209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic predisposition to smoking is associated with risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a Mendelian randomization study.
    Qian Y; Zhang L; Wu DJH; Xie Z; Wen C; Mao Y
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2020 Mar; 22(1):44. PubMed ID: 32143697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations.
    Hartwig FP; Tilling K; Davey Smith G; Lawlor DA; Borges MC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 50(5):1639-1650. PubMed ID: 33619569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Educational attainment impacts drinking behaviors and risk for alcohol dependence: results from a two-sample Mendelian randomization study with ~780,000 participants.
    Rosoff DB; Clarke TK; Adams MJ; McIntosh AM; Davey Smith G; Jung J; Lohoff FW
    Mol Psychiatry; 2021 Apr; 26(4):1119-1132. PubMed ID: 31649322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.