1363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29686172)
1. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.
McClinton S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Lam T; Hernandez R; Pickard R; Anson K; Clark T; MacLennan S; Thomas D; Smith D; Turney B; McDonald A; Cameron S; Wiseman O
Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 32498699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007044. PubMed ID: 19821393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Nov; (11):CD007044. PubMed ID: 25418417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Setthawong V; Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Pattanittum P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD007044. PubMed ID: 37526261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.
Desai M; Sun Y; Buchholz N; Fuller A; Matsuda T; Matlaga B; Miller N; Bolton D; Alomar M; Ganpule A
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 28303335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tailored minimally invasive management of complex calculi in horseshoe kidney.
Ding J; Zhang Y; Cao Q; Huang T; Xu W; Huang K; Fang J; Bai Q; Qi J; Huang Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 26409427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones of 2-4 cm in diameter: a randomized controlled trial].
Li JW; Wang F; Cai FZ; Gao HZ
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 27998863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.
Mi Y; Ren K; Pan H; Zhu L; Wu S; You X; Shao H; Dai F; Peng T; Qin F; Wang J; Huang Y
Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):353-65. PubMed ID: 26530230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. reply letter to Reply letter to: Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Cubuk A; Özkaptan O; Sahan A
Urol J; 2021 Jan; 18(3):351-352. PubMed ID: 33495987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.
Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of calyceal diverticular stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: long-term outcome.
Turna B; Raza A; Moussa S; Smith G; Tolley DA
BJU Int; 2007 Jul; 100(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 17552962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for high-density, renal stones: a prospective, randomised trial.
Ahmed AF; Abdelazim H; ElMesery M; El-Feky M; Gomaa A; Tagreda I; Abozied H; Fahim A
BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128(6):744-751. PubMed ID: 34028170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Management of Calyceal Diverticular Calculi.
Zhang JQ; Wang Y; Zhang JH; Zhang XD; Xing NZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Sep; 129(17):2067-73. PubMed ID: 27569233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy a safe alternative to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric age group in borderline stones? a randomized prospective study.
Farouk A; Tawfick A; Shoeb M; Mahmoud MA; Mostafa DE; Hasan M; Abdalla HM
World J Urol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 29450731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Chang X; Li J; Han Z
Int Braz J Urol; 2020; 46(6):902-926. PubMed ID: 32459455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
