10444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29686387)
1. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases.
Verbanck M; Chen CY; Neale B; Do R
Nat Genet; 2018 May; 50(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29686387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing MR-PRESSO and GCTA-GSMR for pleiotropy assessment in Mendelian randomization studies from a practitioner's perspective.
Ong JS; MacGregor S
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 43(6):609-616. PubMed ID: 31045282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies.
Hemani G; Bowden J; Davey Smith G
Hum Mol Genet; 2018 Aug; 27(R2):R195-R208. PubMed ID: 29771313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploiting horizontal pleiotropy to search for causal pathways within a Mendelian randomization framework.
Cho Y; Haycock PC; Sanderson E; Gaunt TR; Zheng J; Morris AP; Davey Smith G; Hemani G
Nat Commun; 2020 Feb; 11(1):1010. PubMed ID: 32081875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian network analysis incorporating genetic anchors complements conventional Mendelian randomization approaches for exploratory analysis of causal relationships in complex data.
Howey R; Shin SY; Relton C; Davey Smith G; Cordell HJ
PLoS Genet; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1008198. PubMed ID: 32119656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Type 2 diabetes and glycemic traits are not causal factors of delirium: A two-sample mendelian randomization analysis.
Li J; Yang M; Luo P; Wang G; Dong B; Xu P
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1087878. PubMed ID: 36896238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical comparisons of multiple Mendelian randomization approaches in the presence of assortative mating.
Minică CC; Boomsma DI; Dolan CV; de Geus E; Neale MC
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 32155257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics.
Morrison J; Knoblauch N; Marcus JH; Stephens M; He X
Nat Genet; 2020 Jul; 52(7):740-747. PubMed ID: 32451458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Profile-likelihood Bayesian model averaging for two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization in the presence of horizontal pleiotropy.
Shapland CY; Zhao Q; Bowden J
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(6):1100-1119. PubMed ID: 35060160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic causal relationship between age at menarche and benign oesophageal neoplasia identified by a Mendelian randomization study.
Su Y; Hu Y; Xu Y; Yang M; Wu F; Peng Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1113765. PubMed ID: 37025412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using genetic variants to evaluate the causal effect of serum vitamin D concentration on COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and hospitalization traits: a Mendelian randomization study.
Cui Z; Tian Y
J Transl Med; 2021 Jul; 19(1):300. PubMed ID: 34246301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of nonrandom selection mechanisms on the causal effect estimation for two-sample Mendelian randomization methods.
Yu Y; Hou L; Shi X; Sun X; Liu X; Yu Y; Yuan Z; Li H; Xue F
PLoS Genet; 2022 Mar; 18(3):e1010107. PubMed ID: 35298462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Causal association between inflammatory bowel disease and IgA nephropathy: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Xiao M; Ran Y; Shao J; Lei Z; Chen Y; Li Y
Front Genet; 2022; 13():1002928. PubMed ID: 36467999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
