BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29686397)

  • 1. Influence of age on histologic outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during observational management: results from large cohort, systematic review, meta-analysis.
    Bekos C; Schwameis R; Heinze G; Gärner M; Grimm C; Joura E; Horvat R; Polterauer S; Polterauer M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6383. PubMed ID: 29686397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy: postpartum histo-pathologic outcome and review of the literature.
    Mailath-Pokorny M; Schwameis R; Grimm C; Reinthaller A; Polterauer S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():74. PubMed ID: 27055819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-grade cervical neoplasia during pregnancy: diagnosis, management and postpartum findings.
    Coppolillo EF; DE Ruda Vega HM; Brizuela J; Eliseth MC; Barata A; Perazzi BE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Mar; 92(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 22880637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and the clinical significance of p16(INK4a) protein as a marker of progression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I].
    Wang R; Li X; Qian M; Niu J; You Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 26268412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
    Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
    Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
    Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years.
    Sykes PH; Simcock BJ; Innes CR; Harker D; Williman JA; Whitehead M; van der Griend RA; Lawton BA; Hibma M; Fitzgerald P; Dudley NM; Petrich S; Eva L; Bergzoll C; Kathuria J; McPherson G; Tristram A; Faherty J; Hardie D; Robertson A; Robertson V; Pather S; Wrede CD; Gastrell F; Fentiman G; John M; White E; Parker C; Sadler L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):222.e1-222.e13. PubMed ID: 34534506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Postoperative verification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade].
    Starzewski J; Góźdź S; Chil A; Piasek G; Plutecki J; Smorag L; Dembowska R; Krawczyk J
    Wiad Lek; 2003; 56(3-4):162-6. PubMed ID: 12923964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
    Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
    BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Detected by Colposcopy-Directed or Random Biopsy Relative to Age, Cytology, Human Papillomavirus 16, and Lesion Size.
    Chen Q; Du H; Pretorius RG; Wang C; Yang B; Wang G; Tang J; Belinson JL; Wu R
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Jul; 20(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 26855144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal study of human papillomavirus persistence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3: critical role of duration of infection.
    Rodríguez AC; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Hildesheim A; Bratti C; Sherman ME; Solomon D; Guillén D; Alfaro M; Morales J; Hutchinson M; Katki H; Cheung L; Wacholder S; Burk RD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Mar; 102(5):315-24. PubMed ID: 20157096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical management and follow-up of squamous intraepithelial cervical lesions during pregnancy and postpartum.
    Frega A; Scirpa P; Corosu R; Verrico M; Scarciglia ML; Primieri MR; Palazzo A; Iacovelli R; Moscarini M
    Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(4C):2743-6. PubMed ID: 17695441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcome of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy: A 10-year experience.
    Hong DK; Kim SA; Lim KT; Lee KH; Kim TJ; So KA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May; 236():173-176. PubMed ID: 30933887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recurrence of high-grade cervical abnormalities following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2.
    Wilkinson TM; Sykes PH; Simcock B; Petrich S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):769.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25582099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for discrepancy: do preoperative factors predict presence of significant cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
    Matthews KS; Rocconi RP; Case AS; Estes JM; Straughn JM; Huh WK
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Apr; 11(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 17415109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HPV, histologic grade and age. Risk factors for the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Konno R; Paez C; Sato S; Yajima A; Fukao A
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Jul; 43(7):561-6. PubMed ID: 9693405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of guidelines for observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in young women.
    Dempster-Rivett K; Innes CR; Simcock BJ; Harker D; Williman JA; Van Der Griend RA; Whitehead M; Hibma M; Lawton BA; Fitzgerald P; Dudley NM; Petrich S; Faherty J; Bergzoll C; Eva L; Sadler L; Pather S; Wrede CD; Sykes PH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 223(3):408.e1-408.e11. PubMed ID: 32109465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescent and young women.
    Fuchs K; Weitzen S; Wu L; Phipps MG; Boardman LA
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 20(5):269-74. PubMed ID: 17868892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.