181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29686758)
1. Feedback Credibility in a Formative Postgraduate Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Effects of Examiner Type.
Stroud L; Sibbald M; Richardson D; McDonald-Blumer H; Cavalcanti RB
J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Apr; 10(2):185-191. PubMed ID: 29686758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A communication assessment and skill-building exercise (CASE) for first-year residents.
Roth CS; Watson KV; Harris IB
Acad Med; 2002 Jul; 77(7):746-7. PubMed ID: 12114167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Teaching about Substance Abuse with Objective Structured Clinical Exams.
Parish SJ; Ramaswamy M; Stein MR; Kachur EK; Arnsten JH
J Gen Intern Med; 2006 May; 21(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 16704387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance-Based Assessment in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Residency Training.
Aras S; Serim Demirgören B
Acad Psychiatry; 2022 Feb; 46(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 34128192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of an objective structured clinical examination with postgraduate residents in pediatrics.
Hilliard RI; Tallett SE
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1998 Jan; 152(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 9452712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feedback in an Entrustment-Based Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Analysis of Content and Scoring Methods.
Nguyen-Tri I; Tremblay-Laroche D; Lavigne F; Tremblay ML; Lafleur A
J Grad Med Educ; 2024 Jun; 16(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 38882423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Changing Examiner Stations During UK Postgraduate Surgery Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Influence Examination Reliability and Candidates' Scores?
Brennan PA; Croke DT; Reed M; Smith L; Munro E; Foulkes J; Arnett R
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 26923102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do clinical clerks provide candidates with adequate formative assessment during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations?
Reiter HI; Rosenfeld J; Nandagopal K; Eva KW
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 15316270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Resident Self-Evaluation to Standardized Patient Evaluators in a Multi-Institutional Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Objectively Measuring Residents' Communication and Counseling Skills.
Diaczok BJ; Brennan S; Levine D; Hilu R; Thati N; Kruer J; Ahsan S; McNally P; Pieper D
Simul Healthc; 2020 Apr; 15(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 32044855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills.
Kogan JR; Conforti LN; Bernabeo EC; Durning SJ; Hauer KE; Holmboe ES
Med Educ; 2012 Feb; 46(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 22239334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study.
Kim KJ; Kim G
Korean J Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 32(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32130851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?
Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T
Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of examiner type on dental students' OSCE scores.
Park SE; Kim A; Kristiansen J; Karimbux NY
J Dent Educ; 2015 Jan; 79(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25576557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Objective Structured Clinical Examination to Improve Formative Assessment for Senior Pediatrics Residents.
Mangold KA; Jeffers JM; Burns RA; Trainor JL; Unti SM; Eppich W; Adler MD
J Grad Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 7(3):470-4. PubMed ID: 26457159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why do physicians volunteer to be OSCE examiners?
Humphrey-Murto S; Wood TJ; Touchie C
Med Teach; 2005 Mar; 27(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 16019341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.
Zimmermann P; Kadmon M
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Overcoming the Challenges of Direct Observation and Feedback Programs: A Qualitative Exploration of Resident and Faculty Experiences.
Young JQ; Sugarman R; Schwartz J; O'Sullivan PS
Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(5):541-551. PubMed ID: 32529844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "On the same page"? The effect of GP examiner feedback on differences in rating severity in clinical assessments: a pre/post intervention study.
Sturman N; Ostini R; Wong WY; Zhang J; David M
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 17(1):101. PubMed ID: 28587597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using standardized patients' marks in scoring postgraduate psychiatry OSCEs.
Whelan P; Church L; Kadry K
Acad Psychiatry; 2009; 33(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 19690114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of physician examiners', standardized patients', and communication experts' ratings of international medical graduates' English proficiency.
Rothman AI; Cusimano M
Acad Med; 2000 Dec; 75(12):1206-11. PubMed ID: 11112723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
