These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29687358)

  • 1. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To be or not to be...included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping.
    Frings C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1209-27. PubMed ID: 21707218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual modulation of prime response retrieval processes: Evidence from auditory negative priming.
    Mayr S; Möller M; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 30094603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distractor-based retrieval in action control: the influence of encoding specificity.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 30173278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociation of binding and learning processes.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2590-2605. PubMed ID: 28752283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brightness versus darkness: The influence of stimulus intensity on the distractor-response binding effect.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103224. PubMed ID: 33316459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the decay of distractor-response episodes.
    Frings C
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 20705549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.
    Moeller B; Frings C; Pfister R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):464-79. PubMed ID: 26501840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loss of attentional inhibition in older adults--Does it really exist? An experimental dissociation of inhibitory and memory retrieval processes.
    Giesen C; Eberhard M; Rothermund K
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Jun; 30(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 25961880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response retrieval in a go/no-go priming-of-popout task.
    Burnham BR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1187-94. PubMed ID: 23595351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated.
    Frings C; Moeller B; Rothermund K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):700-9. PubMed ID: 23392625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why star retrieves scar: Binding and retrieval of perceptual distractor features.
    Laub R; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):350-363. PubMed ID: 31180703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Belongs Together Retrieves Together - The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval.
    Schmalbrock P; Kiesel A; Frings C
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):28. PubMed ID: 36072092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrieval of bindings between task-irrelevant stimuli and responses can facilitate behaviour under conditions of high response certainty.
    Horner AJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):561-73. PubMed ID: 26085119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 214(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 21822951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Useful distracting information: ERP correlates of distractors in stimulus-response-episodes.
    Priester LD; Wiswede D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206468. PubMed ID: 30383821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysing the relationship between target-to-target and distractor-to-target repetitions: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Frings C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1641-9. PubMed ID: 18609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disentangling inhibition-based and retrieval-based aftereffects of distractors: Cognitive versus motor processes.
    Singh T; Laub R; Burgard JP; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):797-805. PubMed ID: 29154633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.