BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29687373)

  • 1. The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis.
    Ishihara S; Kiyomatsu T; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Hata K; Kazama S; Sunami E; Nozawa H; Watanabe T
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 29687373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic Resection is a Good Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Compared with Laparoscopic Resection: Long-term Survival Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.
    Kim J; Baek SJ; Kang DW; Roh YE; Lee JW; Kwak HD; Kwak JM; Kim SH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Mar; 60(3):266-273. PubMed ID: 28177988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
    Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):721-728. PubMed ID: 26092002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?
    Ackerman SJ; Daniel S; Baik R; Liu E; Mehendale S; Tackett S; Hellan M
    J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 29065737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of middle-low rectal cancer].
    Zhang H; Yuan W; Zhou Q; Gu X; Wang F
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 May; 20(5):540-544. PubMed ID: 28534332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
    Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
    Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of outcome and cost among open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for rectal cancer: A propensity score matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data.
    Chen ST; Wu MC; Hsu TC; Yen DW; Chang CN; Hsu WT; Wang CC; Lee M; Liu SH; Lee CC;
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 29284067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case-matched analysis.
    Sugoor P; Verma K; Chaturvedi A; Kannan S; Desouza A; Ostwal V; Engineer R; Saklani A
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1965. PubMed ID: 30318725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
    Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study.
    Kwak JM; Kim SH; Kim J; Son DN; Baek SJ; Cho JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Feb; 54(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 21228661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.