These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29687373)

  • 1. The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis.
    Ishihara S; Kiyomatsu T; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Hata K; Kazama S; Sunami E; Nozawa H; Watanabe T
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 29687373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study.
    Panteleimonitis S; Pickering O; Abbas H; Harper M; Kandala N; Figueiredo N; Qureshi T; Parvaiz A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1079-1086. PubMed ID: 29577170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study on surgical outcomes and long-term survival.
    Peng J; Zhang W; Li W; Ding P; Lu Z; Wu X; Lin J; Pan Z
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jul; 18(1):299. PubMed ID: 39073652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential
    Kim IK; Lee CS; Bae JH; Han SR; Alshalawi W; Kim BC; Lee IK; Lee DS; Lee YS
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Jan; 28(1):25. PubMed ID: 38231341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted resection of T4 rectal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a national cancer database.
    Emile SH; Horesh N; Freund MR; Garoufalia Z; Gefen R; Silva-Alvarenga E; Dasilva G; Wexner SD
    Br J Surg; 2023 Jan; 110(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 36471483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Zhang J; Huang F; Niu R; Mei S; Quan J; Hu G; Li B; Zhuang M; Guo W; Wang X; Tang J
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Aug; 28(1):100. PubMed ID: 39138721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Barzola E; Cornejo L; Gómez N; Pigem A; Julià D; Ortega N; Delisau O; Bobb KA; Farrés R; Planellas P
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Dec; 17(6):3013-3023. PubMed ID: 37924415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of robotic surgery on low anterior resection syndrome in patients with lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Zhang L; Hu C; Zhao J; Wu C; Zhang Z; Li R; Liu R; She J; Shi F
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):1912-1921. PubMed ID: 38326587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic radical surgery for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
    Maeda C; Yamaoka Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Hino H; Manabe S; Kai C; Nanishi K
    BMC Surg; 2024 May; 24(1):141. PubMed ID: 38720315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility and outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with preexisting colostomy.
    Nozawa H; Sakamoto A; Murono K; Sasaki K; Emoto S; Ishihara S
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Aug; 28(1):102. PubMed ID: 39138696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal tumors: a single-center safety and feasibility study.
    Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Takahashi T; Hayashi H; Higashi T; Fukada M; Asai R; Sato Y; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Matsuhashi N
    Surg Today; 2024 May; 54(5):478-486. PubMed ID: 37907648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: single-center, retrospective, propensity score analyses.
    Mazaki J; Ishizaki T; Kuboyama Y; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Yamada T; Nagakawa Y
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):157. PubMed ID: 38568362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal malignancy in obese patients: a propensity score-weighted cohort study.
    Hsu YJ; Yu YL; Jhuang JR; You JF; Liao CK; Tsai WS; Pan YP; Chern YJ
    Int J Surg; 2024 Aug; 110(8):4598-4607. PubMed ID: 38833348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comment on: Outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted resection of T4 rectal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a national cancer database.
    Yang X; Hu Q
    Br J Surg; 2023 Oct; 110(11):1562. PubMed ID: 37654206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer in patients with varied body mass indexes: evaluating of short-term outcomes.
    Zhao S; Li R; Zhou J; Sun L; Sun Q; Wang W; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):67. PubMed ID: 38329619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional robotic colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching study.
    Huang Y; Yu N
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):175. PubMed ID: 38619667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.