These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29687373)

  • 21. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A propensity-score matching analysis.
    Chen TC; Liang JT
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2022 Aug; 121(8):1532-1540. PubMed ID: 34789424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.
    Phan K; Kahlaee HR; Kim SH; Toh JWT
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Mar; 23(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30623315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kang SB; Park JW; Jeong SY; Nam BH; Choi HS; Kim DW; Lim SB; Lee TG; Kim DY; Kim JS; Chang HJ; Lee HS; Kim SY; Jung KH; Hong YS; Kim JH; Sohn DK; Kim DH; Oh JH
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 Jul; 11(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 20610322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes.
    Kim YS; Kim MJ; Park SC; Sohn DK; Kim DY; Chang HJ; Nam BH; Oh JH
    Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jan; 48(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 25779367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study.
    Panteleimonitis S; Pickering O; Abbas H; Harper M; Kandala N; Figueiredo N; Qureshi T; Parvaiz A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1079-1086. PubMed ID: 29577170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.
    Montalti R; Scuderi V; Patriti A; Vivarelli M; Troisi RI
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1004-13. PubMed ID: 26123328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients.
    Ahmed J; Cao H; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 28644545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study on surgical outcomes and long-term survival.
    Peng J; Zhang W; Li W; Ding P; Lu Z; Wu X; Lin J; Pan Z
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jul; 18(1):299. PubMed ID: 39073652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.
    Kang J; Yoon KJ; Min BS; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Lee KY
    Ann Surg; 2013 Jan; 257(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 23059496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Wakasugi M; Miyagaki H; Kawabata R; Tsujie M; Hasegawa J
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 33886065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
    Gorgun E; Ozben V; Costedio M; Stocchi L; Kalady M; Remzi F
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?
    Bayraktar O; Aytaç E; Özben V; Atasoy D; Bilgin İA; Erenler Bayraktar İ; Baca B; Hamzaoğlu İ; Karahasanoğlu T
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2018 Feb; 28(1):e8-e11. PubMed ID: 29252933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of surgical approach on short-term oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
    Midura EF; Hanseman DJ; Hoehn RS; Davis BR; Abbott DE; Shah SA; Paquette IM
    Surgery; 2015 Aug; 158(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 25999253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of symptomatic anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients.
    Katsuno H; Shiomi A; Ito M; Koide Y; Maeda K; Yatsuoka T; Hase K; Komori K; Minami K; Sakamoto K; Saida Y; Saito N
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2848-56. PubMed ID: 26487228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database.
    Chiu CC; Hsu WT; Choi JJ; Galm B; Lee MG; Chang CN; Liu CC; Lee CC
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 30675661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.