These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29688252)

  • 41. The effect of pressure drop on respirator faceseal leakage.
    Janssen L; Weber R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Jul; 2(7):335-40. PubMed ID: 16020096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-certified particulate air-purifying filtering facepiece respirators: evaluation by light scattering photometric and particle number-based test methods.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 22239104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing.
    Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR; Zhuang Z
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):862-70. PubMed ID: 9866166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Measurement of protection factor of respiratory protective devices toward nanoparticles.
    Brochot C; Michielsen N; Chazelet S; Thomas D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):595-605. PubMed ID: 22752098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Performance Comparison of Field Portable Instruments to the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Using Monodispersed and Polydispersed Sodium Chloride Aerosols.
    Vo E; Horvatin M; Zhuang Z
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Jul; 62(6):711-720. PubMed ID: 29788040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reliability of N95 respirators for respiratory protection before, during, and after nursing procedures.
    Suen LKP; Yang L; Ho SSK; Fung KHK; Boost MV; Wu CST; Au-Yeung CH; O'Donoghue M
    Am J Infect Control; 2017 Sep; 45(9):974-978. PubMed ID: 28526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. NIOSH respirator testing rules give industry some breathing room.
    Smith RB
    Occup Health Saf; 1994 Oct; 63(10):84-7. PubMed ID: 9156448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A laboratory study of the performance of the handheld diffusion size classifier (DiSCmini) for various aerosols in the 15-400 nm range.
    Bau S; Zimmermann B; Payet R; Witschger O
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Feb; 17(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 25366997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prototype sampling system for measuring workplace protection factors for gases and vapors.
    Groves WA; Reynolds SJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 12746083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Characteristics of face seal leakage in filtering facepieces.
    Chen CC; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Sep; 53(9):533-9. PubMed ID: 1524028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Simplified pressure method for respirator fit testing.
    Han D; Xu M; Foo S; Pilacinski W; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Aug; 52(8):305-8. PubMed ID: 1927906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Human subject testing of leakage in a loose-fitting PAPR.
    Johnson AT; Koh FC; Jamshidi S; Rehak TE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 May; 5(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 18348078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Experiments supporting the use of ambient aerosols for quantitative respirator fit testing.
    Ernstberger HG; Gall RB; Turok CW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Dec; 49(12):613-9. PubMed ID: 3213815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Strategies for the prevention of a successful biological warfare aerosol attack.
    Wiener SL
    Mil Med; 1996 May; 161(5):251-6. PubMed ID: 8855053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of two portable real-time particle monitors used in nanomaterial workplace exposure evaluations.
    Liu Y; Beaucham CC; Pearce TA; Zhuang Z
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105769. PubMed ID: 25148239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Method development study for APR cartridge evaluation in fire overhaul exposures.
    Anthony TR; Joggerst P; James L; Burgess JL; Leonard SS; Shogren ES
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):703-16. PubMed ID: 17989124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part III--Validation.
    Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 10386357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Noninvasive, quantitative respirator fit testing through dynamic pressure measurement.
    Carpenter DR; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Oct; 49(10):485-91. PubMed ID: 3189157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies.
    Brouwer DH; Gijsbers JH; Lurvink MW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jul; 48(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 15240340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.