These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2968826)

  • 1. The acceptability of cochlear implants and vibrotactile aids.
    Thornton AR
    Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 2968826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibrotactile devices as sensory aids for the deaf.
    Miyamoto RT; Myres WA; Wagner M; Punch JL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Jul; 97(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 2956557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audiological rehabilitation with cochlear implants and tactile aids.
    Osberger MJ
    ASHA; 1990 Apr; 32(4):38-43. PubMed ID: 2139781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception with a single-channel cochlear implant: a comparison with a single-channel tactile device.
    Carney AE; Kienle M; Miyamoto RT
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2141660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The Mini-Fonator: a portable vibrotactile aid, a tool for aid in communication for the profoundly deaf, both children and adults].
    Chabrol A; Guérin F; Rebufy M; Le Tousse A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1986; 107(5):429-31. PubMed ID: 2951830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The child with hearing deficiency. Medical, educational, sociological and psychological aspects].
    Périer O; De Temmerman P
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(3):342-57. PubMed ID: 2975135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Maso M; Sam LK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 36(1):186-203. PubMed ID: 8450658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of hearing aids and cochlear implants in profoundly and totally deaf persons.
    Spillmann T; Dillier N
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Aug; 24(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 2224288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What can we learn about hearing aids from cochlear implants?
    Tyler RS
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6 Suppl):177S-186S. PubMed ID: 1794644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiological results using single-channel intracochlear implant, vibrotactile aid or acoustic hearing aids.
    Rihkanen H; Jauhiainen T; Linkola H; Palva T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1989; 108(3-4):184-9. PubMed ID: 2816334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing and trials of hearing aids and assistive devices.
    Chute PM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):208-13. PubMed ID: 9334766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective benefit of communication aids evaluated by postlingually deaf adults.
    Rihkanen H
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Jun; 24(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 2364187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.
    Bond M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Elston J; Weiner G; Taylor RS; Hoyle M; Liu Z; Price A; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Sep; 13(44):1-330. PubMed ID: 19799825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telephone use: what benefit do cochlear implant users receive?
    Anderson I; Baumgartner WD; Böheim K; Nahler A; Arnoldner C; D'Haese P
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):446-53. PubMed ID: 17005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results following cochlear implantation and rehabilitation.
    Engelmann LR; Waterfall MK; Hough JV
    Laryngoscope; 1981 Nov; 91(11):1821-33. PubMed ID: 6895398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implants, vibrators and hearing aids in the rehabilitation of postlingual deafness.
    Rihkanen H; Jauhiainen T; Linkola H; Palva T
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 2371535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Dowell RC; Martin LF; Clark GM; Brown AM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 3160295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hearing quality with different cochlear implants].
    Helms J; Moser L
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2010 Nov; 89(11):660-1. PubMed ID: 20563966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.