These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29689434)

  • 1. Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography for High-Risk Smokers in Australia.
    Wade S; Weber M; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Marshall H; Manser R; Vinod S; Rankin N; Fong K; Canfell K
    J Thorac Oncol; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1094-1105. PubMed ID: 29689434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness and health impact of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for never smokers in Japan and the United States: a modelling study.
    Kowada A
    BMC Pulm Med; 2022 Jan; 22(1):19. PubMed ID: 34996423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Snowsill T; Yang H; Griffin E; Long L; Varley-Campbell J; Coelho H; Robinson S; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(69):1-276. PubMed ID: 30518460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation-outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
    Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
    Lung Cancer; 2016 Nov; 101():98-103. PubMed ID: 27794416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.
    Criss SD; Cao P; Bastani M; Ten Haaf K; Chen Y; Sheehan DF; Blom EF; Toumazis I; Jeon J; de Koning HJ; Plevritis SK; Meza R; Kong CY
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 171(11):796-804. PubMed ID: 31683314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand.
    Jaine R; Kvizhinadze G; Nair N; Blakely T
    Lung Cancer; 2018 Oct; 124():233-240. PubMed ID: 30268467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost of screening for lung cancer in Australia.
    Marshall HM; Finn N; Bowman RV; Passmore LH; McCaul EM; Yang IA; Connelly L; Fong KM
    Intern Med J; 2019 Nov; 49(11):1392-1399. PubMed ID: 31336016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
    Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in heavy smokers: a microsimulation modelling study.
    Du Y; Sidorenkov G; Heuvelmans MA; Groen HJM; Vermeulen KM; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 135():121-129. PubMed ID: 32563896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Kumar V; Cohen JT; van Klaveren D; Soeteman DI; Wong JB; Neumann PJ; Kent DM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 168(3):161-169. PubMed ID: 29297005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Black WC; Gareen IF; Soneji SS; Sicks JD; Keeler EB; Aberle DR; Naeim A; Church TR; Silvestri GA; Gorelick J; Gatsonis C;
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(19):1793-802. PubMed ID: 25372087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic literature review.
    Puggina A; Broumas A; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    Eur J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 26(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 26370440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wattson DA; Hunink MG; DiPiro PJ; Das P; Hodgson DC; Mauch PM; Ng AK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 25104066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lung cancer screening program in the netherlands: a simulation based on NELSON and NLST study outcomes.
    Ten Berge H; Willems B; Pan X; Dvortsin E; Aerts J; Postma MJ; Prokop M; van den Heuvel MM
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):1197-1211. PubMed ID: 39291295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of Low-Dose Computed Tomography With a Plasma-Based Biomarker for Lung Cancer Screening in China.
    Zhao Z; Wang Y; Wu W; Yang Y; Du L; Dong H
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2213634. PubMed ID: 35608858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trade-off between benefits, harms and economic efficiency of low-dose CT lung cancer screening: a microsimulation analysis of nodule management strategies in a population-based setting.
    Treskova M; Aumann I; Golpon H; Vogel-Claussen J; Welte T; Kuhlmann A
    BMC Med; 2017 Aug; 15(1):162. PubMed ID: 28838313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada.
    Ten Haaf K; Tammemägi MC; Bondy SJ; van der Aalst CM; Gu S; McGregor SE; Nicholas G; de Koning HJ; Paszat LF
    PLoS Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):e1002225. PubMed ID: 28170394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: costs, national expenditures, and cost-effectiveness.
    Goulart BH; Bensink ME; Mummy DG; Ramsey SD
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2012 Feb; 10(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 22308519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lung Cancer Screening Strategies Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: a Systematic Review.
    Raymakers AJN; Mayo J; Lam S; FitzGerald JM; Whitehurst DGT; Lynd LD
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 26873091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.