These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29689443)

  • 41. Role of Muscle Synergies in Real-Time Classification of Upper Limb Motions using Extreme Learning Machines.
    Antuvan CW; Bisio F; Marini F; Yen SC; Cambria E; Masia L
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 13(1):76. PubMed ID: 27527511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Musculoskeletal model-based control interface mimics physiologic hand dynamics during path tracing task.
    Crouch DL; Huang HH
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Jun; 14(3):036008. PubMed ID: 28220759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Continuous grip force estimation from surface electromyography using generalized regression neural network.
    Mao H; Fang P; Zheng Y; Tian L; Li X; Wang P; Peng L; Li G
    Technol Health Care; 2023; 31(2):675-689. PubMed ID: 36120747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Transradial Amputee Gesture Classification Using an Optimal Number of sEMG Sensors: An Approach Using ICA Clustering.
    Naik GR; Al-Timemy AH; Nguyen HT
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Aug; 24(8):837-46. PubMed ID: 26394431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparison of the real-time controllability of pattern recognition to conventional myoelectric control for discrete and simultaneous movements.
    Young AJ; Smith LH; Rouse EJ; Hargrove LJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 11():5. PubMed ID: 24410948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Use of probabilistic weights to enhance linear regression myoelectric control.
    Smith LH; Kuiken TA; Hargrove LJ
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066030. PubMed ID: 26595317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Identification of motion from multi-channel EMG signals for control of prosthetic hand.
    Geethanjali P; Ray KK
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2011 Sep; 34(3):419-27. PubMed ID: 21667211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Resolving the limb position effect in myoelectric pattern recognition.
    Fougner A; Scheme E; Chan AD; Englehart K; Stavdahl O
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Dec; 19(6):644-51. PubMed ID: 21846608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dynamic time warping for reducing the effect of force variation on myoelectric control of hand prostheses.
    Powar OS; Chemmangat K
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2019 Oct; 48():152-160. PubMed ID: 31357113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interface Prostheses With Classifier-Feedback-Based User Training.
    Fang Y; Zhou D; Li K; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2575-2583. PubMed ID: 28026744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Classification of Transient Myoelectric Signals for the Control of Multi-Grasp Hand Prostheses.
    Kanitz G; Cipriani C; Edin BB
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Sep; 26(9):1756-1764. PubMed ID: 30072331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Voluntary phantom hand and finger movements in transhumerai amputees could be used to naturally control polydigital prostheses.
    Jarrasse N; Nicol C; Richer F; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; De Graaf JB
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1239-1245. PubMed ID: 28813991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. IMU-Based Wrist Rotation Control of a Transradial Myoelectric Prosthesis.
    Bennett DA; Goldfarb M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Feb; 26(2):419-427. PubMed ID: 28320673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Influence of the weight actions of the hand prosthesis on the performance of pattern recognition based myoelectric control: preliminary study.
    Cipriani C; Sassu R; Controzzi M; Carrozza MC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1620-3. PubMed ID: 22254633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Selecting the optimal movement subset with different pattern recognition based EMG control algorithms.
    Al-Timemy AH; Khushaba RN; Escudero J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():315-318. PubMed ID: 28268340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses.
    Young AJ; Kuiken TA; Hargrove LJ
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Oct; 11(5):056021. PubMed ID: 25242111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A preliminary investigation of the effect of force variation for myoelectric control of hand prosthesis.
    Al-Timemy AH; Bugmann G; Escudero J; Outram N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5758-61. PubMed ID: 24111046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Relationship between grasping force and features of single-channel intramuscular EMG signals.
    Kamavuako EN; Farina D; Yoshida K; Jensen W
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Dec; 185(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19747943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Invariant Surface EMG Feature Against Varying Contraction Level for Myoelectric Control Based on Muscle Coordination.
    He J; Zhang D; Sheng X; Li S; Zhu X
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 May; 19(3):874-82. PubMed ID: 25014975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis.
    Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.