These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29691330)

  • 1. Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search.
    Donohue SE; Bartsch MV; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(20):4738-4748. PubMed ID: 29691330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical Learning of Distractor Suppression Downregulates Prestimulus Neural Excitability in Early Visual Cortex.
    Ferrante O; Zhigalov A; Hickey C; Jensen O
    J Neurosci; 2023 Mar; 43(12):2190-2198. PubMed ID: 36801825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learned and cued distractor rejection for multiple features in visual search.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):359-376. PubMed ID: 30421366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction.
    de Vries IEJ; Savran E; van Driel J; Olivers CNL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 31(12):1873-1894. PubMed ID: 31418334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time-course of component processes of selective attention.
    Wen T; Duncan J; Mitchell DJ
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():396-407. PubMed ID: 31150787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.
    Moher J; Egeth HE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1590-605. PubMed ID: 22893004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search.
    Wang B; van Driel J; Ort E; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 31(10):1535-1548. PubMed ID: 31180265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.
    Hilimire MR; Hickey C; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
    Gong M; Jia K; Li S
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities.
    Mazaheri A; van Schouwenburg MR; Dimitrijevic A; Denys D; Cools R; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():356-62. PubMed ID: 24188814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
    Noonan MP; Adamian N; Pike A; Printzlau F; Crittenden BM; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(6):1797-807. PubMed ID: 26865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Neural Dynamics of Attentional Selection in Natural Scenes.
    Kaiser D; Oosterhof NN; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 36(41):10522-10528. PubMed ID: 27733605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandatory processing of irrelevant fearful face features in visual search.
    Fenker DB; Heipertz D; Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Noesselt T; Heinze HJ; Duezel E; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2926-38. PubMed ID: 19702468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.