These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29691663)

  • 1. Tooth sectioning for coronectomy: how to perform?
    Szalma J; Vajta L; Olasz L; Lempel E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):519-527. PubMed ID: 29691663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraosseous Heat Production and Preparation Efficiency of Surgical Tungsten Carbide Round Drills: The Effect of Coronectomy on Drill Wear.
    Szalma J; Kiss C; Gurdán Z; Tóth Á; Olasz L; Jakse N
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):442-52. PubMed ID: 26704431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Water Coolant and Bur Type on Pulp Temperature When Removing Tooth Structure and Restorative Dental Materials.
    Mafrici C; Kingston M; Grice R; Abbott PV
    Oper Dent; 2024 Jan; 49(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 38057997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recommended Drilling Parameters of Tungsten Carbide Round Drills for the Most Optimal Bone Removals in Oral Surgery.
    Szalma J; Klein O; Lovász BV; Lempel E; Jeges S; Olasz L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():3108581. PubMed ID: 30581849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intracanal temperature changes during bone preparations close to and penetrating the inferior alveolar canal: Drills versus piezosurgery.
    Szalma J; Vajta L; Lempel E; Tóth Á; Jeges S; Olasz L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1622-1631. PubMed ID: 28843405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of tooth preparation burs on the roughness and bond strength of adhesives to human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Maghrabi AA; Saif RE; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2011 Jun; 24(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 21874939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High and low torque handpieces: cutting dynamics, enamel cracking and tooth temperature.
    Watson TF; Flanagan D; Stone DG
    Br Dent J; 2000 Jun; 188(12):680-6. PubMed ID: 11022384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of 10 different rotary cutting instruments. Part I: Turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):248-61. PubMed ID: 19328278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of the cutting efficiency and working life of carbide burs.
    Di Cristofaro RG; Giner L; Mayoral JR
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 23387508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of sectioning rates among carbide and diamond burs using three casting alloys.
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Dec; 8(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 10895675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
    Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temperature variations in pulp chamber: an in-vitro comparison between ultrasonic and rotating instruments in tooth preparation. Part 1.
    Baldi D; Colombo J; Robiony M; Menini M; Bisagni E; Pera P
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Feb; 69(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 31633318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of tooth preparation on pressure measured in the pulp chamber: a laboratory study.
    Evans CD; Wilson PR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 10709526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iatrogenic tooth abrasion comparisons among composite materials and finishing techniques.
    Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 12426504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of surface preparation on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin.
    Peerzada F; Yiu CK; Hiraishi N; Tay FR; King NM
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 21180001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of bur blade concentricity on high-speed tooth-cutting interactions: a video-rate confocal microscopic study.
    Watson TF; Cook RJ
    J Dent Res; 1995 Nov; 74(11):1749-55. PubMed ID: 8530736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel, new generation drill coating for osteotomy site preparation.
    Wadkar PP; Khalap S; Shetty D; Gupta A; Shetty A; Dharmadhikari S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(5):767-771. PubMed ID: 31854371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The magnitude of cutting forces at high speed.
    Elias K; Amis AA; Setchell DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 12644805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light-touch?
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Mar; 8(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10356549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.