These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29691882)

  • 1. Mental state at time of offense in the hot tub: An empirical examination of concurrent expert testimony in an insanity case.
    Krauss DA; Gongola J; Scurich N; Busch B
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):358-372. PubMed ID: 29691882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the waters: An investigation of the impact of hot tubbing on experts from referral through testimony.
    Perillo JT; Perillo AD; Despodova NM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):229-242. PubMed ID: 34351205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
    Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insanity: making law in the absence of evidence.
    Finkel NJ
    Med Law; 1992; 11(5-6):383-404. PubMed ID: 1484462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
    Devenport JL; Cutler BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
    Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: a survey of the courts and bar.
    Redding RE; Floyd MY; Hawk GL
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 11568962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The mental disability requirement in the insanity defense.
    Slovenko R
    Behav Sci Law; 1999; 17(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 10398328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From mental health professional to expert witness: testifying in court.
    Bank SC
    New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1996; (69):5-14. PubMed ID: 8935818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Jurors' views on the value and objectivity of mental health experts testifying in sexually violent predator trials.
    Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Turner DB
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):483-95. PubMed ID: 25043830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complexity and the role of expert witness: when determinations of legal insanity become murky.
    Thom K
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 20507423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
    Cooper J; Hall J
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When insanity has gone undiscovered by the courts: The practice of the Norwegian Criminal Cases Review Commission in cases of doubts about insanity.
    Grøndahl P; Stridbeck U
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Jul; 26(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 26032297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
    Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The psychiatric expert in court.
    Kenny A
    Psychol Med; 1984 May; 14(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 6739627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychiatrists and the parameters of expert testimony.
    Rogers R; Bagby RM; Chow MM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 1428422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.