102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29693230)
1. Impact of port site scar on perception of patients with breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes.
Voci A; Lee D; Ho E; Crane-Okada R; DiNome M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 170(3):569-572. PubMed ID: 29693230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of totally implanted venous access port placement on body image in women with breast cancer.
Pizzuti G; Cassani C; Bottazzi A; Ruggieri A; Della Valle A; Dionigi F; Anghelone CAP; Sgarella A; Ferrari A
J Vasc Access; 2024 Mar; 25(2):673-676. PubMed ID: 36401349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the impact of anterior chest wall scars from implantable venous ports in adolescent survivors of cancer.
Connolly BL; Amirabadi A; Goman S; Aloia AA; Fish J; Alexander N; Nathan PC
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2022 Sep; 69(9):e29832. PubMed ID: 35796091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient scar assessment after single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial.
Ostlie DJ; Sharp NE; Thomas P; Sharp SW; Holcomb GW; St Peter SD
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Jun; 23(6):553-5. PubMed ID: 23731081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trapezius Port Placement in Patients with Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up and Quality-of-Life Assessment.
Çil BE; Öcal O; Eldem FG; Peynircioğlu B; Balkancı F
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 30527656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midcervical scar satisfaction in thyroidectomy patients.
Best AR; Shipchandler TZ; Cordes SR
Laryngoscope; 2017 May; 127(5):1247-1252. PubMed ID: 27519726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the perceptions and cosmetic satisfaction of breast cancer patients undergoing totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD) placement.
Liberale G; El Houkayem M; Viste C; Bouazza F; Moreau M; El Nakadi I; Veys I
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Dec; 24(12):5035-5040. PubMed ID: 27495928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal placement of a brachioplasty scar: a survey evaluation.
Samra S; Samra F; Liu YJ; Sawh-Martinez R; Persing J
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 23407254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How do breast cancer surgery scars impact survivorship? Findings from a nationwide survey in the United States.
Gass J; Mitchell S; Hanna M
BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):342. PubMed ID: 30971201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient and parental scar assessment after single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial.
Gasior AC; Knott EM; Holcomb GW; Ostlie DJ; St Peter SD
J Pediatr Surg; 2014 Jan; 49(1):120-2; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 24439594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient opinion of scarring is multidimensional: An investigation of the POSAS with confirmatory factor analysis.
DeJong HM; Phillips M; Edgar DW; Wood FM
Burns; 2017 Feb; 43(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 27576936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-port access compared with three-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery in a randomized controlled trial.
Yoo EH; Shim E
J Int Med Res; 2013 Jun; 41(3):673-80. PubMed ID: 23653366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.
Sun J; Mu D; Liu C; Ji K; Chen L; Liu W; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 27484988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients.
Marcy PY; Magné N; Castadot P; Bailet C; Macchiavello JC; Namer M; Gallard JC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Jul; 92(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15980992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin Deep: Perception of Scars After Cranial Vault Reconstruction.
Roy T; Chavez J; R Reid R
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2021 Nov; 58(11):1376-1381. PubMed ID: 33375823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Satisfaction and Quality of Life Related to Chemotherapy With an Arm Port: A Pilot Study.
Burbridge B; Chan IY; Bryce R; Lim HJ; Stoneham G; Haggag H; Roh C
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Aug; 67(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 27209217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scar perceptions after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: comparison of minimal and conventional approaches.
Linos D; Economopoulos KP; Kiriakopoulos A; Linos E; Petralias A
Surgery; 2013 Mar; 153(3):400-7. PubMed ID: 22980435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Satisfaction of Paediatric Oncology Patients, Survivors, and Nurses with the Position of Their Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (SPACE-Study).
van den Bosch CH; van de Ven CP; Hulsker CCC; Bökkerink GMJ; Terwisscha-van Scheltinga CEJ; van de Wetering MD; Koopman MMW; van der Pal HJH; Wijnen MWHA; van der Steeg AFW
J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38212153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Totally implantable vascular access device (TIVAD) placement: a modified technique that takes post-procedure aesthetic aspects into account.
Liberale G
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Apr; 25(4):1137-1140. PubMed ID: 27888350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trocar port scar quality in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery.
de Vries CEE; Dekker AC; van Veen RN; van der Zeeuw FT; Coblijn UK; Brölmann FE; van Wagensveld BA
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 May; 14(5):616-622. PubMed ID: 29610013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
