These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29693230)

  • 21. Visible vs hidden scars and their relation to body esteem.
    Lawrence JW; Fauerbach JA; Heinberg L; Doctor M
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2004; 25(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 14726736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multimodality scar management program.
    Widgerow AD; Chait LA; Stals PJ; Stals R; Candy G
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jul; 33(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 19048338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management.
    Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC
    Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No-vertical-scar technique versus inverted T-scar technique in reduction mammoplasty: a two-center comparative study.
    Hosnuter M; Tosun Z; Kargi E; Babuccu O; Savaci N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 16328641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study.
    O'Connell DA; Diamond C; Seikaly H; Harris JR
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jan; 134(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 18209143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: does the patient agree with what we think?
    Martin D; Umraw N; Gomez M; Cartotto R
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(4):239-44; discussion 238. PubMed ID: 14501421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term cosmetic outcomes after robotic/endoscopic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach.
    Ji YB; Song CM; Bang HS; Lee SH; Park YS; Tae K
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Apr; 24(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 24684254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimal-scar laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).
    Kim E; Kim D; Lee S; Lee H
    Obes Surg; 2009 Apr; 19(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 18839082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction.
    Ignatov A; Hoffman O; Smith B; Fahlke J; Peters B; Bischoff J; Costa SD
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18329836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Where do you insert a drain tube during breast reconstruction?
    Nishioka H; Yasunaga Y; Yanagisawa D; Yuzuriha S; Ito KI
    Surg Today; 2020 Dec; 50(12):1626-1632. PubMed ID: 32507906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Horizontal or vertical? an evaluation of patient preferences for reduction mammaplasty scars.
    Sprole AM; Adepoju I; Ascherman J; Gayle LB; Grant RT; Talmor M
    Aesthet Surg J; 2007; 27(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 19341651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Importance of patient reported outcome measures versus clinical outcomes for breast cancer patients evaluation on quality of care.
    Kool M; van der Sijp JR; Kroep JR; Liefers GJ; Jannink I; Guicherit OR; Vree R; Bastiaannet E; van de Velde CJ; Marang-van de Mheen PJ
    Breast; 2016 Jun; 27():62-8. PubMed ID: 27026219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Insights into patient and clinician concerns about scar appearance: semiquantitative structured surveys.
    Young VL; Hutchison J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Jul; 124(1):256-265. PubMed ID: 19568089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies.
    Kreis H; Loehberg CR; Lux MP; Ackermann S; Lang W; Beckmann MW; Fasching PA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 33(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17029869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative cross-sectional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conventional laparoscopic surgery.
    Eom JM; Ko JH; Choi JS; Hong JH; Lee JH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Mar; 167(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 23265299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The perception of scar cosmesis following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: A prospective cohort study.
    Arora A; Swords C; Garas G; Chaidas K; Prichard A; Budge J; Davies DC; Tolley N
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():38-43. PubMed ID: 26602967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome of breast-preserving cancer treatment.
    Patterson MP; Pezner RD; Hill LR; Vora NL; Desai KR; Lipsett JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Oct; 11(10):1849-52. PubMed ID: 4044347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parental and Volunteer Perception of Pyloromyotomy Scars: Comparing Laparoscopic, Open, and Nonsurgical Volunteers.
    St Peter SD; Acher CW; Shah SR; Sharp SW; Ostlie DJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Apr; 26(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 26982115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of burn-specific health-related quality of life and patient scar status following burn.
    Oh H; Boo S
    Burns; 2017 Nov; 43(7):1479-1485. PubMed ID: 28539239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.