209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29693646)
1. Effects of C5/C6 Intervertebral Space Distraction Height on Pressure on the Adjacent Intervertebral Disks and Articular Processes and Cervical Vertebrae Range of Motion.
Lu T; Luo C; Ouyang B; Chen Q; Deng Z
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Apr; 24():2533-2540. PubMed ID: 29693646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.
Eck JC; Humphreys SC; Lim TH; Jeong ST; Kim JG; Hodges SD; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2431-4. PubMed ID: 12435970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of disk fenestration on sagittal kinematics of the canine C5-C6 intervertebral space.
Macy NB; Les CM; Stover SM; Kass PH
Vet Surg; 1999; 28(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 10338162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural space integrity of the lower cervical spine: effect of normal range of motion.
Nuckley DJ; Konodi MA; Raynak GC; Ching RP; Mirza SK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Mar; 27(6):587-95. PubMed ID: 11884906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis.
Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Fujii R; Nakajima Y; Tamura S; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2826-31. PubMed ID: 15599286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine during seated axial rotation and lateral bending via a fluoroscopy-to-CT registration approach.
Lin CC; Lu TW; Wang TM; Hsu CY; Hsu SJ; Shih TF
J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3310-7. PubMed ID: 25218506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.
Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of different artificial disc heights during total cervical disc replacement: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Wang XF; Meng Y; Liu H; Wang BY; Hong Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 33407705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of facet and graft loading in a Smith-Robinson type cervical spine model.
Olsewski JM; Garvey TA; Schendel MJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Nov; 19(22):2540-4. PubMed ID: 7855678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion pattern of the canine cervical spine segment C4-C5.
Hofstetter M; Gédet P; Doherr M; Ferguson SJ; Forterre F
Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 19152617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):939-47. PubMed ID: 20375779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of Cervical Spinal Joint Loading and Secondary Motion Using a Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Model Via Force-Dependent Kinematics Approach.
Diao H; Xin H; Dong J; He X; Li D; Jin Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1403-E1409. PubMed ID: 28368985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of graft size on spinal instability with anterior cervical plate fixation following in vitro flexion-distraction injuries.
Yao R; McLachlin SD; Rasoulinejad P; Gurr KR; Siddiqi F; Dunning CE; Bailey CS
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):523-9. PubMed ID: 26282105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical stability of lower cervical spine immediately after discectomy with grafting.
Yin DZ; Xin XT; Yang R; Shi YP; Shen HY
Orthop Surg; 2011 May; 3(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 22009596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
