These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29694260)

  • 1. Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Vogel EK; Awh E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 30(8):1185-1196. PubMed ID: 29694260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does Contralateral Delay Activity Reflect Working Memory Storage or the Current Focus of Spatial Attention within Visual Working Memory?
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 28(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27458749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shifts of Spatial Attention in Visual and Tactile Working Memory are Controlled by Independent Modality-Specific Mechanisms.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 Jan; 30(1):296-310. PubMed ID: 31070225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological evidence supports the role of sustained visuospatial attention in maintaining visual WM contents.
    Liang T; Chen X; Ye C; Zhang J; Liu Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():54-62. PubMed ID: 31639381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 May; 30(5):644-655. PubMed ID: 29346019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance.
    Adam KCS; Robison MK; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1229-1240. PubMed ID: 29308988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective Selection in Visual and Tactile Working Memory Is Mediated by Shared Control Mechanisms.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 32(3):546-557. PubMed ID: 31659924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The capacity and resolution of spatial working memory and its role in the storage of non-spatial features.
    McCants CW; Katus T; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():108-118. PubMed ID: 30550778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple foci of spatial attention in multimodal working memory.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():583-589. PubMed ID: 27544450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interval between two sequential arrays determines their storage state in visual working memory.
    Li Z; Zhang J; Liang T; Ye C; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7706. PubMed ID: 32382102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contralateral delay activity tracks the storage of visually presented letters and words.
    Rajsic J; Burton JA; Woodman GF
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Jan; 56(1):e13282. PubMed ID: 30246442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does visual working memory represent the predicted locations of future target objects? An event-related brain potential study.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():258-66. PubMed ID: 25445999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):357-371. PubMed ID: 29943810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electroencephalogram Decoding Reveals Distinct Processes for Directing Spatial Attention and Encoding Into Working Memory.
    Jones HM; Diaz GK; Ngiam WXQ; Awh E
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Oct; 35(10):1108-1138. PubMed ID: 39159181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory.
    Hakim N; Adam KCS; Gunseli E; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Apr; 30(4):526-540. PubMed ID: 30817220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reactivation of task rules triggers the reactivation of task-relevant items.
    Şentürk YD; Ünver N; Demircan C; Egner T; Günseli E
    Cortex; 2024 Feb; 171():465-480. PubMed ID: 38141571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural measures of dynamic changes in attentive tracking load.
    Drew T; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Feb; 24(2):440-50. PubMed ID: 21812558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Searching for targets in visual working memory: investigating a dimensional feature bundle (DFB) model.
    Töllner T; Mink M; Müller HJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():32-44. PubMed ID: 25716303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention modulates maintenance of representations in visual short-term memory.
    Kuo BC; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 24(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 21736457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.