131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29694271)
1. The psychosocial impact of assistive device scale: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders.
Tofani M; Candeloro C; Sabbadini M; Lucibello L; Figura M; Fabbrini G; Galeoto G; Castelli E
Assist Technol; 2020; 32(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 29694271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version.
Hsieh YJ; Lenker JA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2006; 1(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 19256167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS): translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian-French version.
Demers L; Monette M; Descent M; Jutai J; Wolfson C
Qual Life Res; 2002 Sep; 11(6):583-92. PubMed ID: 12206579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form.
Berardi A; De Santis R; Tofani M; Márquez MA; Santilli V; Rushton PW; Mollica R; Galeoto G
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):575-580. PubMed ID: 28758517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-cultural adaptation of the psychosocial impact of assistive device scale (PIADS) for Puerto Rican assistive technology users.
Orellano EM; Jutai JW
Assist Technol; 2013; 25(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 24620702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) with users of mobility assistive device.
Colucci M; Tofani M; Trioschi D; Guarino D; Berardi A; Galeoto G
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Apr; 16(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 31553245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and validation of Korean version of psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale.
Chae SY; Jo SJ
Assist Technol; 2014; 26(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24800453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring Validity, Reliability, and Factor Analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology in an Italian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Galeoto G; Colucci M; Guarino D; Esposito G; Cosma E; De Santis R; Grifoni G; Valente D; Tofani M
Occup Ther Health Care; 2018 Oct; 32(4):380-392. PubMed ID: 30596451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychosocial impact of mobility assistive technology on people with neurological conditions.
Jiménez Arberas E; Ordoñez Fernández FF; Rodríguez Menéndez S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):465-471. PubMed ID: 31553255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychometric properties of the psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): A systematic review.
Atigossou OLG; Honado AS; Routhier F; Flamand VH
Assist Technol; 2023 May; 35(3):211-219. PubMed ID: 34813722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version.
Mao HF; Chen WY; Yao G; Huang SL; Lin CC; Huang WN
Clin Rehabil; 2010 May; 24(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 20442253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile-Roland Scale for chronic pain: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.
Monticone M; Baiardi P; Nava T; Rocca B; Foti C
Disabil Rehabil; 2011; 33(15-16):1299-305. PubMed ID: 21034202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability, convergent validity and applicability of the Assistive Technology Outcome Profile for Mobility for middle-aged and older power wheelchair users.
Auger C; Rushton PW; Jutai JW; Miller WC
Aust Occup Ther J; 2018 Oct; 65(5):439-448. PubMed ID: 30178483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The psychosocial impact on standing devices.
Nordström B; Nyberg L; Ekenberg L; Näslund A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 23782225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale in a Large Sample of People With Neuromuscular, Neurological, or Hearing Disabilities.
Díez E; Jiménez-Arberas E; Pousada T
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():659562. PubMed ID: 34177710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Translation and validation of the Persian version of "The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale" in patients with neurological disorders.
Saeed SS; Hejazi-Shirmard M; Akbarzadeh Baghban A; Jutai J; Rezaee M
Assist Technol; 2024 Jun; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 38916516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Translation and validation of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment in Greek in order to assess satisfaction with use of the selected assistive device.
Koumpouros Y; Papageorgiou E; Karavasili A; Alexopoulou D
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Jul; 12(5):535-542. PubMed ID: 27049479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis.
Demers L; Monette M; Lapierre Y; Arnold DL; Wolfson C
Disabil Rehabil; 2002 Jan 10-Feb 15; 24(1-3):21-30. PubMed ID: 11827151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).
Torre M; Luzi I; Mirabella F; Del Manso M; Zanoli G; Tucci G; Romanini E
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Jun; 16(1):115. PubMed ID: 29866107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead.
Day H; Jutai J; Campbell KA
Disabil Rehabil; 2002 Jan 10-Feb 15; 24(1-3):31-7. PubMed ID: 11827152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
