These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2969445)

  • 1. Vox Populi and Baby Doe.
    Turnbull HR; Guess D; Turnbull AP
    Ment Retard; 1988 Jun; 26(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 2969445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disconnecting the Baby Doe hotline.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Jun; 13(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 6224760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who is responsible for Baby Doe?
    Rome LP
    Ohio State Med J; 1984 Jan; 80(1):21-3, 25, 27. PubMed ID: 6229705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. View from the Nation's Courts.
    Freishtat HW
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1986 Oct; 6(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 2945836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remembering the politics of Baby Doe.
    Prout DM
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1986; 6(7):15, 22. PubMed ID: 10317770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reagan Administration revises "Baby Doe" regulations.
    Iglehart JK
    Hosp Prog; 1984 Feb; 65(2):17, 20. PubMed ID: 10317422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proposed 'Baby Doe' regulations draw 20,000 comments from public.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(5):112. PubMed ID: 10270813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Final judgment issued in case challenging Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Backsliding on "Baby Doe"?
    Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):11, 15. PubMed ID: 10317572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Government petitions U.S. Supreme Court on Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Apr; 8(7):9. PubMed ID: 10325192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 'Baby Doe' call and its consequences.
    Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):67-73. PubMed ID: 6233214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Baby Doe' thrusts administrators into middle of life-death decision.
    Punch L; Simler SL
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Jul; 12(7):72-4. PubMed ID: 10317219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby Jane Doe case: does Section 504 of rehab law apply to hospitals?
    Weissburg C; Guth J
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 10317455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe.
    Kerr K
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 6237076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Government abandons efforts to obtain records of "Baby Jane Doe"; in AHA v. Heckler, government motion filed in Second Circuit denied.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Aug; 7(18):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe?
    Jolly CM
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Baby Doe'--a medical ethical issue.
    Lang GC
    West J Med; 1985 Jun; 142(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 4024642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Baby Doe rules issued.
    Holden C
    Science; 1984 Jan; 223(4633):264. PubMed ID: 6701511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.