These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29694622)

  • 1. Evaluation of radiofrequency electronic system in intraoperative monitoring of surgical textiles.
    Antonio AM; Vieira CAP
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2018; 16(1):eAO3997. PubMed ID: 29694622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
    Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
    Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.
    Macario A; Morris D; Morris S
    Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):659-62. PubMed ID: 16847236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients.
    Rupp CC; Kagarise MJ; Nelson SM; Deal AM; Phillips S; Chadwick J; Petty T; Meyer AA; Kim HJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 215(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 22770865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radio-frequency identification of surgical sponges in the abdominal cavity of pigs.
    Wiederkehr JC; Gama RR; Wiederkehr HA; Stelmasuk K; Carvalho CA; Wiederkehr BA
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2014 Jun; 3(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 25568782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges.
    Rogers A; Jones E; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1235-7. PubMed ID: 17484000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval?
    Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N
    Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: a prospective, cross-over study.
    Steelman VM
    Am J Surg; 2011 Feb; 201(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 21266216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
    Williams TL; Tung DK; Steelman VM; Chang PK; Szekendi MK
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Sep; 219(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 25081938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
    Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
    Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
    Babayan RK
    J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2019. PubMed ID: 25986812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing gravimetric estimation of intraoperative blood loss.
    Johar RS; Smith RP
    J Gynecol Surg; 1993; 9(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 10171989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
    Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tracking itinerant patients and surgical sponges.
    Korcok M
    CMAJ; 2009 Apr; 180(8):E14-5. PubMed ID: 19364776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time monitoring for detection of retained surgical sponges and team motion in the surgical operation room using radio-frequency-identification (RFID) technology: a preclinical evaluation.
    Kranzfelder M; Zywitza D; Jell T; Schneider A; Gillen S; Friess H; Feussner H
    J Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 175(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 21571315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compatibility of Radiofrequency Surgical Sponge Detection Technology with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Temporary Pacemakers.
    Salcedo JD; Pretorius VG; Hsu JC; Lalani GG; Schricker AA; Hebsur SM; McGARRY TJ; Hunter JA; Lewis KE; Krummen DE; Feld GK; Birgersdotter-Green U
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Nov; 39(11):1254-1260. PubMed ID: 27550834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Use of Radiofrequency Detection to Mitigate the Risk of Retained Surgical Sponges.
    Bardes JM; Inaba K
    Adv Surg; 2017 Sep; 51(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 28797342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Textile foreign bodies left in the abdomen].
    Slim K; Ben Slimane T; Dziri C; Mzabi R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(4-5):280-3. PubMed ID: 2268134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained surgical needles in the peritoneal cavity.
    Ponrartana S; Coakley FV; Yeh BM; Breiman RS; Qayyum A; Joe BN; Poder L; Lu Y; Gibbs VC; Roberts JP
    Ann Surg; 2008 Jan; 247(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18156915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retained surgical sponges.
    Dieter RA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Mar; 216(3):509. PubMed ID: 23415408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.