These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29695234)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model.
    Arrospide A; Idigoras I; Mar J; de Koning H; van der Meulen M; Soto-Gordoa M; Martinez-Llorente JM; Portillo I; Arana-Arri E; Ibarrondo O; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):464. PubMed ID: 29695234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic evaluation of the breast cancer screening programme in the Basque Country: retrospective cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis.
    Arrospide A; Rue M; van Ravesteyn NT; Comas M; Soto-Gordoa M; Sarriugarte G; Mar J
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jun; 16():344. PubMed ID: 27251556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the colorectal cancer screening Programme in the Basque Country (Spain) and its effectiveness based on the Miscan-colon model.
    Idigoras I; Arrospide A; Portillo I; Arana-Arri E; Martínez-Indart L; Mar J; de Koning HJ; Lastra R; Soto-Gordoa M; van der Meulen M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Aug; 18(1):78. PubMed ID: 28764731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Kirby PL; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Little M; Gray A; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 May; 26(26):1-156. PubMed ID: 35635015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personalizing colonoscopy screening for elderly individuals based on screening history, cancer risk, and comorbidity status could increase cost effectiveness.
    van Hees F; Saini SD; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Vijan S; Meester RG; de Koning HJ; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Nov; 149(6):1425-37. PubMed ID: 26253304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Oct; 101(20):1412-22. PubMed ID: 19779203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Xu XM; Greuter MJE; Caruana M; Cenin DR; He E; Saville M; Grogan P; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Lancet Public Health; 2017 Jul; 2(7):e331-e340. PubMed ID: 29253458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Budget Impact Analysis of Against Colorectal Cancer In Our Neighborhoods (ACCION): A Successful Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for a Medically Underserved Minority Population.
    Kim B; Lairson DR; Chung TH; Kim J; Shokar NK
    Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):809-818. PubMed ID: 28577699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in a low incidence country: The case of Saudi Arabia.
    Naber SK; Almadi MA; Guyatt G; Xie F; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(4):208-216. PubMed ID: 33835054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening: a cost-saving analysis.
    Loeve F; Brown ML; Boer R; van Ballegooijen M; van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Apr; 92(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 10749911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Greuter MJE; de Klerk CM; Meijer GA; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):544-554. PubMed ID: 28973514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model.
    Meester RG; Doubeni CA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Jensen CD; van der Meulen MP; Levin TR; Quinn VP; Schottinger JE; Zauber AG; Corley DA; van Ballegooijen M
    JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(23):2349-58. PubMed ID: 26080339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.
    Cenin DR; Naber SK; de Weerdt AC; Jenkins MA; Preen DB; Ee HC; O'Leary PC; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2020 Jan; 29(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 31748260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
    Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimising colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: a modelling study.
    Cenin D; Li P; Wang J; de Jonge L; Yan B; Tao S; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e048156. PubMed ID: 35577474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
    Hristova L; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
    Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening.
    Bronzwaer MES; Greuter MJE; Bleijenberg AGC; IJspeert JEG; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):465. PubMed ID: 29695244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.