BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29696313)

  • 1. Using proprioception to control ongoing actions: dominance of vision or altered proprioceptive weighing?
    Goodman R; Tremblay L
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1897-1910. PubMed ID: 29696313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Micro movements of the upper limb in fibromyalgia: The relation to proprioceptive accuracy and visual feedback.
    Bardal EM; Roeleveld K; Ihlen E; Mork PJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2016 Feb; 26():1-7. PubMed ID: 26790141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets.
    Goble DJ; Brown SH
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 99(6):3063-74. PubMed ID: 18436632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amending Ongoing Upper-Limb Reaches: Visual and Proprioceptive Contributions?
    Goodman R; Crainic VA; Bested SR; Wijeyaratnam DO; de Grosbois J; Tremblay L
    Multisens Res; 2018 Jan; 31(5):455-480. PubMed ID: 31264599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target modality affects visually guided online control of reaching.
    Cameron BD; López-Moliner J
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):233-43. PubMed ID: 24997229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contributions of exercise-induced fatigue versus intertrial tendon vibration on visual-proprioceptive weighting for goal-directed movement.
    Manzone DM; Tremblay L
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Sep; 124(3):802-814. PubMed ID: 32755335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic Multisensory Integration: Somatosensory Speed Trumps Visual Accuracy during Feedback Control.
    Crevecoeur F; Munoz DP; Scott SH
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(33):8598-611. PubMed ID: 27535908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy.
    Miall RC; Kitchen NM; Nam SH; Lefumat H; Renault AG; Ørstavik K; Cole JD; Sarlegna FR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2137-2155. PubMed ID: 29779050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.
    Saijo N; Gomi H
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1576-85. PubMed ID: 22190631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Force control in the absence of visual and tactile feedback.
    Mugge W; Abbink DA; Schouten AC; van der Helm FC; Arendzen JH; Meskers CG
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(4):635-45. PubMed ID: 23223780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proprioceptive control of multijoint movement: bimanual circle drawing.
    Verschueren SM; Swinnen SP; Cordo PJ; Dounskaia NV
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Jul; 127(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 10442410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vision and proprioception in action monitoring by young and older adults.
    Rand MK; Wang L; Müsseler J; Heuer H
    Neurobiol Aging; 2013 Jul; 34(7):1864-72. PubMed ID: 23433708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of vision for online control of manual aiming movements in persons with autism spectrum disorders.
    Glazebrook C; Gonzalez D; Hansen S; Elliott D
    Autism; 2009 Jul; 13(4):411-33. PubMed ID: 19535469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Untangling visual and proprioceptive contributions to hand localisation over time.
    Bellan V; Gilpin HR; Stanton TR; Newport R; Gallace A; Moseley GL
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1689-701. PubMed ID: 25757958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Force-field adaptation without proprioception: can vision be used to model limb dynamics?
    Sarlegna FR; Malfait N; Bringoux L; Bourdin C; Vercher JL
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 19695273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.
    Sarlegna FR; Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 16896981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A key region in the human parietal cortex for processing proprioceptive hand feedback during reaching movements.
    Reichenbach A; Thielscher A; Peer A; Bülthoff HH; Bresciani JP
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():615-25. PubMed ID: 24060316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contributions of vision and proprioception to arm movement planning in the vertical plane.
    Apker GA; Karimi CP; Buneo CA
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Oct; 503(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 21889576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reach endpoint errors do not vary with movement path of the proprioceptive target.
    Jones SA; Byrne PA; Fiehler K; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 107(12):3316-24. PubMed ID: 22402658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An optimal velocity for online limb-target regulation processes?
    Tremblay L; Crainic VA; de Grosbois J; Bhattacharjee A; Kennedy A; Hansen S; Welsh TN
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 27618816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.