162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29696580)
41. The replicability of the negative testing effect: Differences across participant populations.
Mulligan NW; Rawson KA; Peterson DJ; Wissman KT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):752-763. PubMed ID: 29094992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Generation and hypermnesia.
Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):436-50. PubMed ID: 11294442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization.
Congleton A; Rajaram S
Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):528-39. PubMed ID: 22160872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. How delay influences search processes at test.
Kliegl O; Carls T; Bäuml KT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2174-2187. PubMed ID: 30883168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Gone but not forgotten: the transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting.
MacLeod MD; Macrae CN
Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 11340924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
Abel M; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
MacLeod CM; Gopie N; Hourihan KL; Neary KR; Ozubko JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):671-85. PubMed ID: 20438265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference.
Burns DJ; Gold DE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):978-85. PubMed ID: 10439504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The negative testing and negative generation effects are eliminated by delay.
Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1014-25. PubMed ID: 25329076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Competitive retrieval is not a prerequisite for forgetting in the retrieval practice paradigm.
Camp G; Dalm S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 70(3):248-252. PubMed ID: 26569141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Priming guesses on a forced-recall test.
Gibson JM; Meade ML
J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jul; 131(3):225-41. PubMed ID: 15248592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The aftermath of memory retrieval for recycling visual working memory representations.
Park HB; Zhang W; Hyun JS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1393-1407. PubMed ID: 28378282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Production on hold: delaying vocal production enhances the production effect in free recall.
Mama Y; Icht M
Memory; 2018 May; 26(5):589-602. PubMed ID: 28974150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Production of picture names improves picture recognition.
Hourihan KL; Churchill LA
Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Mar; 74(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 31393155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Item-method directed forgetting: Effects at retrieval?
Taylor TL; Cutmore L; Pries L
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():116-123. PubMed ID: 29275948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Selective attention affects implicit and explicit memory for familiar pictures at different delay conditions.
Ballesteros S; Reales JM; García E; Carrasco M
Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 17296015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Retrieval-induced forgetting in recall: competitor interference revisited.
Verde MF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1433-48. PubMed ID: 23687918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.
Mulligan NW; Duke MD
Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1044-53. PubMed ID: 12507369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hypermnesia for Socratic stimuli: The growth of recall for an internally generated memory list abstracted from a series of riddles.
Erdelyi M; Buschke H; Finkelstein S
Mem Cognit; 1977 May; 5(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 24202895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
