These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29696594)

  • 1. Using eye movements to understand the leakage of information during Chinese reading.
    Liu Y; Reichle ED
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2323-2329. PubMed ID: 29696594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibitory neighbor priming effects in eye movements during reading.
    Paterson KB; Liversedge SP; Davis CJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19145008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eye-Movement Evidence for Object-Based Attention in Chinese Reading.
    Liu Y; Reichle ED
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 29185866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reading long words embedded in sentences: informativeness of word halves affects eye movements.
    Hyönä J; Niemi P; Underwood G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):142-52. PubMed ID: 2522524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.
    Staub A; Grant M; Clifton C; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):806-14. PubMed ID: 19379050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers.
    Zang C; Zhang M; Bai X; Yan G; Paterson KB; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1409-25. PubMed ID: 26366620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
    Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements.
    Rayner K; Cook AE; Juhasz BJ; Frazier L
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 97(Pt 4):467-82. PubMed ID: 17018184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating word class effects in first and second languages.
    Furtner MR; Rauthmann JF; Sachse P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug; 113(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 21987911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
    Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context.
    Van Assche E; Duyck W; Hartsuiker RJ; Diependaele K
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Aug; 20(8):923-7. PubMed ID: 19549082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of probabilistic lexicality cues for word segmentation in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Wang Y; Bai X; Yan G; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):548-60. PubMed ID: 26145449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.
    Paterson KB; Jordan TR
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 20516230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals.
    Altarriba J; Kambe G; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):875-90. PubMed ID: 11521853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.