147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29697497)
1. Evidence-Based Occupational Hearing Screening I: Modeling the Effects of Real-World Noise Environments on the Likelihood of Effective Speech Communication.
Soli SD; Giguère C; Laroche C; Vaillancourt V; Dreschler WA; Rhebergen KS; Harkins K; Ruckstuhl M; Ramulu P; Meyers LS
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):436-448. PubMed ID: 29697497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based occupational hearing screening II: validation of a screening methodology using measures of functional hearing ability.
Soli SD; Amano-Kusumoto A; Clavier O; Wilbur J; Casto K; Freed D; Laroche C; Vaillancourt V; Giguère C; Dreschler WA; Rhebergen KS
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):323-334. PubMed ID: 29668374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of hearing standards for Ontario's Constable Selection System.
Giguère C; Laroche C; Vaillancourt V; Soli SD
Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 31154860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Verbal communication in MR environments: effect of MR system acoustic noise on speech understanding.
Moelker A; Maas RA; Pattynama PM
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 15220495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test.
Giguère C; Laroche C; Soli SD; Vaillancourt V
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):319-28. PubMed ID: 18569104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of noise on speech recognition: Challenges for communication by service members.
Le Prell CG; Clavier OH
Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():76-89. PubMed ID: 27743882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An approach to the development of hearing standards for hearing-critical jobs.
Laroche C; Soli S; Giguère C; Lagacé J; Vaillancourt V; Fortin M
Noise Health; 2003; 6(21):17-37. PubMed ID: 14965451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of the Everyday Conversational Sentences in Noise test.
Miles KM; Keidser G; Freeston K; Beechey T; Best V; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1562. PubMed ID: 32237858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):856-65. PubMed ID: 20936997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a Test Battery for Evaluating Speech Perception in Complex Listening Environments: Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Phatak SA; Sheffield BM; Brungart DS; Grant KW
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 29570117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing Impairment Increases Communication Effort During Conversations in Noise.
Beechey T; Buchholz JM; Keidser G
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):305-320. PubMed ID: 31846598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond the audiogram: application of models of auditory fitness for duty to assess communication in the real world.
Dubno JR
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):321-322. PubMed ID: 29668372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness.
Vermiglio AJ; Griffin S; Post C; Fang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(7):634-647. PubMed ID: 29988011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting Speech-in-Noise Deficits from the Audiogram.
Shub DE; Makashay MJ; Brungart DS
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31107363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus on speech recognition over air and bone conduction military communications headsets.
Manning C; Mermagen T; Scharine A
Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():67-75. PubMed ID: 27989949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
