These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29697670)

  • 1. [Comparison of digital and visual methods for Ki-67 assessment in invasive breast carcinomas].
    Kushnarev VA; Artemyeva ES; Kudaybergenova AG
    Arkh Patol; 2018; 80(2):38-42. PubMed ID: 29697670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
    Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
    Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: assessment of proliferative activity using automated Ki-67 immunostaining.
    Dessauvagie B; Thomas A; Thomas C; Robinson C; Combrink M; Budhavaram V; Kunjuraman B; Meehan K; Sterrett G; Harvey J
    Pathology; 2019 Dec; 51(7):681-687. PubMed ID: 31630876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ki 67 assessment in breast cancer in an Egyptian population: a comparative study between manual assessment on optical microscopy and digital quantitative assessment.
    Ayad E; Soliman A; Anis SE; Salem AB; Hu P; Dong Y
    Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):63. PubMed ID: 30153851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.
    Tang LH; Gonen M; Hedvat C; Modlin IM; Klimstra DS
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1761-70. PubMed ID: 23026928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility and Prognostic Potential of Ki-67 Proliferation Index when Comparing Digital-Image Analysis with Standard Semi-Quantitative Evaluation in Breast Cancer.
    Ács B; Madaras L; Kovács KA; Micsik T; Tőkés AM; Győrffy B; Kulka J; Szász AM
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2018 Jan; 24(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 28401450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual and digital assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer tissue - a comparison of methods.
    Skjervold AH; Pettersen HS; Valla M; Opdahl S; Bofin AM
    Diagn Pathol; 2022 May; 17(1):45. PubMed ID: 35524221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.
    Acs B; Pelekanou V; Bai Y; Martinez-Morilla S; Toki M; Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL
    Lab Invest; 2019 Jan; 99(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 30181553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-laboratory comparison of Ki-67 proliferating index detected by visual assessment and automated digital image analysis.
    Tomić S; Mrklić I; Razumović JJ; Jonjić N; Šarčević B; Blažičević V; Jurković I; Vrbičić B; Lisica Šikic N; Peteh LL; Lončarić ČT; Vučić M; Gašparov S; Švagelj D; Radiković S; Mahovne I
    Breast Dis; 2019; 38(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 30958325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reliability of Ki-67 assessment in oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
    Jing N; Fang C; Williams DS
    Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 28450087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between Ki67 labeling index determined using image analysis software with virtual slide system and that determined visually in breast cancer.
    Maeda I; Abe K; Koizumi H; Nakajima C; Tajima S; Aoki H; Tsuchiya J; Tsuchiya S; Tsuchiya K; Shimo A; Tsugawa K; Ueno T; Tatsunami S; Takagi M
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 26271611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical issues concerning the implementation of Ki-67 proliferative index measurement in breast cancer reporting.
    Harvey J; Thomas C; Wood B; Hardie M; Dessauvagie B; Combrinck M; Frost FA; Sterrett G
    Pathology; 2015 Jan; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 25474507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements.
    Boukhar SA; Gosse MD; Bellizzi AM; Rajan K D A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Sep; 156(4):607-619. PubMed ID: 33847759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital immunohistochemistry wizard: image analysis-assisted stereology tool to produce reference data set for calibration and quality control.
    Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 25565221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer: the utility of digital image analysis using virtual triple staining and whole slide imaging.
    Hida AI; Omanovic D; Pedersen L; Oshiro Y; Ogura T; Nomura T; Kurebayashi J; Kanomata N; Moriya T
    Histopathology; 2020 Sep; 77(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 32578891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardization for Ki-67 assessment in moderately differentiated breast cancer. A retrospective analysis of the SAKK 28/12 study.
    Varga Z; Cassoly E; Li Q; Oehlschlegel C; Tapia C; Lehr HA; Klingbiel D; Thürlimann B; Ruhstaller T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123435. PubMed ID: 25885288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
    Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential Pitfalls in Diagnostic Digital Image Analysis: Experience with Ki-67 and PHH3 in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
    Hacking SM; Sajjan S; Lee L; Ziemba Y; Angert M; Yang Y; Jin C; Chavarria H; Kataria N; Jain S; Nasim M
    Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Mar; 216(3):152753. PubMed ID: 31761497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.