These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29697670)

  • 21. Digital quantification of KI-67 in breast cancer.
    Del Rosario Taco Sanchez M; Soler-Monsó T; Petit A; Azcarate J; Lasheras A; Artal C; Gil M; Falo C; Pla MJ; Matias-Guiu X
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Feb; 474(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 30465110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bimodality of intratumor Ki67 expression is an independent prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Rasmusson A; Besusparis J; Augulis R; Meskauskas R; Herlin P; Laurinaviciene A; Abdelhadi Muftah AA; Miligy I; Aleskandarany M; Rakha EA; Green AR; Ellis IO
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Apr; 468(4):493-502. PubMed ID: 26818835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Proliferation assessment in breast carcinomas using digital image analysis based on virtual Ki67/cytokeratin double staining.
    Røge R; Riber-Hansen R; Nielsen S; Vyberg M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 27283833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of digital image analysis and visual scoring of KI-67 in prostate cancer prognosis after prostatectomy.
    Desmeules P; Hovington H; Nguilé-Makao M; Léger C; Caron A; Lacombe L; Fradet Y; Têtu B; Fradet V
    Diagn Pathol; 2015 Jun; 10():67. PubMed ID: 26070608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison Between Manual and Automated Assessment of Ki-67 in Breast Carcinoma: Test of a Simple Method in Daily Practice.
    Catteau X; Zindy E; Bouri S; Noël JC; Salmon I; Decaestecker C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2023; 22():15330338231169603. PubMed ID: 37559526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of tissue sampling on accuracy of Ki67 immunohistochemistry evaluation in breast cancer.
    Besusparis J; Plancoulaine B; Rasmusson A; Augulis R; Green AR; Ellis IO; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2016 Aug; 11(1):82. PubMed ID: 27576949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The human-in-the-loop: an evaluation of pathologists' interaction with artificial intelligence in clinical practice.
    Bodén ACS; Molin J; Garvin S; West RA; Lundström C; Treanor D
    Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):210-218. PubMed ID: 33590577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the methods for measuring the Ki-67 labeling index in adrenocortical carcinoma: manual versus digital image analysis.
    Yamazaki Y; Nakamura Y; Shibahara Y; Konosu-Fukaya S; Sato N; Kubota-Nakayama F; Oki Y; Baba S; Midorikawa S; Morimoto R; Satoh F; Sasano H
    Hum Pathol; 2016 Jul; 53():41-50. PubMed ID: 26980031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between digital image analysis and visual assessment of immunohistochemical HER2 expression in breast cancer.
    Jakobsen MR; Teerapakpinyo C; Shuangshoti S; Keelawat S
    Pathol Res Pract; 2018 Dec; 214(12):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 30377025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of visual assessment and image analysis in the evaluation of Ki-67 expression and their prognostic significance in immunohistochemically defined luminal breast carcinoma.
    Arihiro K; Oda M; Ohara M; Kadoya T; Osaki A; Nishisaka T; Shiroma N; Kobayashi Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 27511992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.
    Luchini C; Pantanowitz L; Adsay V; Asa SL; Antonini P; Girolami I; Veronese N; Nottegar A; Cingarlini S; Landoni L; Brosens LA; Verschuur AV; Mattiolo P; Pea A; Mafficini A; Milella M; Niazi MK; Gurcan MN; Eccher A; Cree IA; Scarpa A
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Jun; 35(6):712-720. PubMed ID: 35249100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer.
    Alataki A; Zabaglo L; Tovey H; Dodson A; Dowsett M
    Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 33590538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Ki-67 labeling index measurements using digital image analysis and scoring by pathologists.
    Morioka T; Niikura N; Kumaki N; Masuda S; Iwamoto T; Yokoyama K; Ogiya R; Oshitanai R; Terao M; Tsuda B; Okamura T; Saito Y; Suzuki Y; Tokuda Y
    Breast Cancer; 2018 Nov; 25(6):768-777. PubMed ID: 29959636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlation of manual semi-quantitative and automated quantitative Ki-67 proliferative index with OncotypeDXTM recurrence score in invasive breast carcinoma.
    Finkelman BS; Meindl A; LaBoy C; Griffin BB; Narayan SP; Brancamp R; Siziopikou KP; Pincus JL; Blanco LZ
    Breast Dis; 2022; 41(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 34397396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability and Variability of Ki-67 Digital Image Analysis Methods for Clinical Diagnostics in Breast Cancer.
    Dawe M; Shi W; Liu TY; Lajkosz K; Shibahara Y; Gopal NEK; Geread R; Mirjahanmardi S; Wei CX; Butt S; Abdalla M; Manolescu S; Liang SB; Chadwick D; Roehrl MHA; McKee TD; Adeoye A; McCready D; Khademi A; Liu FF; Fyles A; Done SJ
    Lab Invest; 2024 May; 104(5):100341. PubMed ID: 38280634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Intraobserver reproducibility of Ki-67 assessment of breast cancers based on digital slide].
    Wang YY; Wang T; Yu H; Xu WM; Yu T; Song SL; Cui J; Yang JL
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 49(11):1163-1168. PubMed ID: 33152823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The region-of-interest size impacts on Ki67 quantification by computer-assisted image analysis in breast cancer.
    Christgen M; von Ahsen S; Christgen H; Länger F; Kreipe H
    Hum Pathol; 2015 Sep; 46(9):1341-9. PubMed ID: 26206765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproducibility of immunostaining quantification and description of a new digital image processing procedure for quantitative evaluation of immunohistochemistry in pathology.
    Bernardo V; Lourenço SQ; Cruz R; Monteiro-Leal LH; Silva LE; Camisasca DR; Farina M; Lins U
    Microsc Microanal; 2009 Aug; 15(4):353-65. PubMed ID: 19575836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer.
    Gudlaugsson E; Skaland I; Janssen EA; Smaaland R; Shao Z; Malpica A; Voorhorst F; Baak JP
    Histopathology; 2012 Dec; 61(6):1134-44. PubMed ID: 22963617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laboratory validation studies in Ki-67 digital image analysis of breast carcinoma: a pathway to routine quality assurance.
    Wang M; McLaren S; Jeyathevan R; Allanson BM; Ireland A; Kang A; Meehan K; Thomas C; Robinson C; Combrinck M; Harvey J; Sterrett G; Dessauvagie B
    Pathology; 2019 Apr; 51(3):246-252. PubMed ID: 30850279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.