These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29697868)

  • 1. A chemical activity approach to exposure and risk assessment of chemicals: Focus articles are part of a regular series intended to sharpen understanding of current and emerging topics of interest to the scientific community.
    Gobas FAPC; Mayer P; Parkerton TF; Burgess RM; van de Meent D; Gouin T
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 May; 37(5):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 29697868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving substance information in USEtox
    Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Radovnikovic A; Secchi M; Sala S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3463-3470. PubMed ID: 28671290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening-Level Estimates of Environmental Release Rates, Predicted Exposures, and Toxic Pressures of Currently Used Chemicals.
    van de Meent D; de Zwart D; Posthuma L
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Sep; 39(9):1839-1851. PubMed ID: 32539202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations.
    Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An approach for assessing human exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment.
    Rice G; MacDonell M; Hertzberg RC; Teuschler L; Picel K; Butler J; Chang YS; Hartmann H
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 233(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 18589469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implications of chemical mixtures in public health practice.
    de Rosa CT; El-Masri HA; Pohl H; Cibulas W; Mumtaz MM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2004; 7(5):339-50. PubMed ID: 15371239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aquatic exposures of chemical mixtures in urban environments: Approaches to impact assessment.
    de Zwart D; Adams W; Galay Burgos M; Hollender J; Junghans M; Merrington G; Muir D; Parkerton T; De Schamphelaere KAC; Whale G; Williams R
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Mar; 37(3):703-714. PubMed ID: 28861906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meeting the common needs of a more effective and efficient testing and assessment paradigm for chemical risk management.
    Dellarco V; Henry T; Sayre P; Seed J; Bradbury S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):347-60. PubMed ID: 20574907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective aquatic risk assessment for chemical mixtures in agricultural landscapes.
    Holmes CM; Brown CD; Hamer M; Jones R; Maltby L; Posthuma L; Silberhorn E; Teeter JS; Warne MSJ; Weltje L
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Mar; 37(3):674-689. PubMed ID: 29193235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe.
    Van den Brink PJ; Boxall ABA; Maltby L; Brooks BW; Rudd MA; Backhaus T; Spurgeon D; Verougstraete V; Ajao C; Ankley GT; Apitz SE; Arnold K; Brodin T; Cañedo-Argüelles M; Chapman J; Corrales J; Coutellec MA; Fernandes TF; Fick J; Ford AT; Giménez Papiol G; Groh KJ; Hutchinson TH; Kruger H; Kukkonen JVK; Loutseti S; Marshall S; Muir D; Ortiz-Santaliestra ME; Paul KB; Rico A; Rodea-Palomares I; Römbke J; Rydberg T; Segner H; Smit M; van Gestel CAM; Vighi M; Werner I; Zimmer EI; van Wensem J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2281-2295. PubMed ID: 30027629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.
    Coady KK; Biever RC; Denslow ND; Gross M; Guiney PD; Holbech H; Karouna-Renier NK; Katsiadaki I; Krueger H; Levine SL; Maack G; Williams M; Wolf JC; Ankley GT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):302-316. PubMed ID: 27791330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures.
    Klecka G; Persoon C; Currie R
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 207():1-93. PubMed ID: 20652664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualitative approach to comparative exposure in alternatives assessment.
    Greggs W; Burns T; Egeghy P; Embry MR; Fantke P; Gaborek B; Heine L; Jolliet O; Lee C; Muir D; Plotzke K; Rinkevich J; Sunger N; Tanir JY; Whittaker M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Nov; 15(6):880-894. PubMed ID: 29917303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the risks of exposures to multiple chemicals with a common mechanism of toxicity: how to cumulate?
    Wilkinson CF; Christoph GR; Julien E; Kelley JM; Kronenberg J; McCarthy J; Reiss R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Feb; 31(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 10715222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving substance information in USEtox
    Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Bopp SK; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Secchi M; Sala S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3450-3462. PubMed ID: 28618056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advancing exposure characterization for chemical evaluation and risk assessment.
    Cohen Hubal EA; Richard A; Aylward L; Edwards S; Gallagher J; Goldsmith MR; Isukapalli S; Tornero-Velez R; Weber E; Kavlock R
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):299-313. PubMed ID: 20574904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Eco-Exposome Concept: Supporting an Integrated Assessment of Mixtures of Environmental Chemicals.
    Scholz S; Nichols JW; Escher BI; Ankley GT; Altenburger R; Blackwell B; Brack W; Burkhard L; Collette TW; Doering JA; Ekman D; Fay K; Fischer F; Hackermüller J; Hoffman JC; Lai C; Leuthold D; Martinovic-Weigelt D; Reemtsma T; Pollesch N; Schroeder A; Schüürmann G; von Bergen M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Jan; 41(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 34714945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterizing the noncancer toxicity of mixtures using concepts from the TTC and quantitative models of uncertainty in mixture toxicity.
    Price PS; Hollnagel HM; Zabik JM
    Risk Anal; 2009 Nov; 29(11):1534-48. PubMed ID: 19886945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should the scope of human mixture risk assessment span legislative/regulatory silos for chemicals?
    Evans RM; Martin OV; Faust M; Kortenkamp A
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Feb; 543(Pt A):757-764. PubMed ID: 26573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.