These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29698034)

  • 1. The native-language benefit for talker identification is robust in 7.5-month-old infants.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1911-1920. PubMed ID: 29698034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of language experience and task demands on talker recognition by children and adults.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2409. PubMed ID: 29716261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. By 4.5 Months, Linguistic Experience Already Affects Infants' Talker Processing Abilities.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 90(5):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 31273757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience.
    Johnson EK; Westrek E; Nazzi T; Cutler A
    Dev Sci; 2011 Sep; 14(5):1002-11. PubMed ID: 21884316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting the talker recognition advantage in bilingual infants.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Feb; 214():105276. PubMed ID: 34507181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological considerations for interpreting the Language Familiarity Effect in talker processing.
    Levi SV
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 10(2):e1483. PubMed ID: 30328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developmental improvements in talker recognition are specific to the native language.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Feb; 202():104991. PubMed ID: 33096370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Other Accent Effect in Talker Recognition: Now You See It, Now You Don't.
    Yu ME; Schertz J; Johnson EK
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12986. PubMed ID: 34170043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Different Types of Linguistic Information Impact Voice Perception: Evidence From the Language-Familiarity Effect.
    Yu K; Zhou Y; Zhang L; Li L; Li P; Wang R
    Lang Speech; 2023 Dec; 66(4):1007-1029. PubMed ID: 36680473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Language exposure facilitates talker learning prior to language comprehension, even in adults.
    Orena AJ; Theodore RM; Polka L
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():36-40. PubMed ID: 26113447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning to contend with accents in infancy: benefits of brief speaker exposure.
    van Heugten M; Johnson EK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):340-50. PubMed ID: 23506084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural basis of language familiarity effects on voice recognition: An fNIRS study.
    Meng Y; Liang C; Chen W; Liu Z; Yang C; Hu J; Gao Z; Gao S
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():1-10. PubMed ID: 38723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How who is talking matters as much as what they say to infant language learners.
    Gonzales K; Gerken L; Gómez RL
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Nov; 106():1-20. PubMed ID: 30121306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indexical and linguistic processing by 12-month-olds: Discrimination of speaker, accent and vowel differences.
    Mulak KE; Bonn CD; Chládková K; Aslin RN; Escudero P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176762. PubMed ID: 28520762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Familiarity, expertise, and change detection: change deafness is worse in your native language.
    Neuhoff JG; Schott SA; Kropf AJ; Neuhoff EM
    Perception; 2014; 43(2-3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24919355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Language-general versus language-specific processes in bilingual voice learning.
    Lloy L; Patil KN; Johnson KA; Babel M
    Cognition; 2024 Sep; 250():105866. PubMed ID: 38971020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative findings of voice and speech: language processing at an early ontogenetic age in quantitative EEG mapping.
    Radicevic Z; Vujovic M; Jelicic L; Sovilj M
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 184(4):529-32. PubMed ID: 17934726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual narrowing of linguistic sign occurs in the 1st year of life.
    Palmer SB; Fais L; Golinkoff RM; Werker JF
    Child Dev; 2012; 83(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 22277043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.