BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29698044)

  • 1. Recollection is fast and slow.
    Brainerd CJ; Nakamura K; Lee WA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):302-319. PubMed ID: 29698044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zheng Z; Li J; Xiao F; Broster LS; Jiang Y; Xi M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25583573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.
    Ramey MM; Henderson JM; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Nov; 149(11):2046-2062. PubMed ID: 32250136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The two recollections.
    Brainerd CJ; Gomes CF; Moran R
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Oct; 121(4):563-99. PubMed ID: 25347309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verbatim editing: A general model of recollection rejection.
    Brainerd CJ; Nakamura K; Chang M; Bialer DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1776-1790. PubMed ID: 30714755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.
    Ingram KM; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):325-39. PubMed ID: 21967320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pupil dilation during recognition reflects the subjective recollection/familiarity experience at test rather than the level of processing at encoding.
    Taikh A; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Sep; 76(3):186-192. PubMed ID: 35549359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
    Taylor JR; Henson RN
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3027-40. PubMed ID: 22898644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection: an fMRI study.
    Morcom AM; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 24(12):2372-84. PubMed ID: 23110678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity.
    Kirwan CB; Wixted JT; Squire LR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jan; 107(1):344-8. PubMed ID: 19966306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
    Jang Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity in the striatum and hippocampus: Across-study convergence.
    King DR; Chastelaine M; Elward RL; Wang TH; Rugg MD
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 354():1-7. PubMed ID: 28803854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Old processes, new perspectives: Familiarity is correlated with (not independent of) recollection and is more (not equally) variable for targets than for lures.
    Moran R; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Jun; 79():40-67. PubMed ID: 25899705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory: Meta-analysis of conjoint recognition.
    Brainerd CJ; Bialer DM; Chang M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1680-1697. PubMed ID: 34516208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.
    Koen JD; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20854009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurophysiological evidence for a recollection impairment in amnesia patients that leaves familiarity intact.
    Addante RJ; Ranganath C; Olichney J; Yonelinas AP
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3004-14. PubMed ID: 22898646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.
    Smith CN; Wixted JT; Squire LR
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(44):15693-702. PubMed ID: 22049412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.
    Yonelinas AP
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2001 Sep; 356(1413):1363-74. PubMed ID: 11571028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.