These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29698050)

  • 41. Isolating the contribution of perceptual fluency to judgments of learning (JOLs): Evidence for reactivity in measuring the influence of fluency.
    Fiacconi CM; Mitton EE; Laursen SJ; Skinner J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 May; 46(5):926-944. PubMed ID: 31556640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Another look at the contribution of motoric fluency to metacognitive monitoring.
    Dollois MA; Poore-Buchhaupt CJ; Fiacconi CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Dec; 76(4):251-269. PubMed ID: 35482620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Not all perceptual difficulties lower memory predictions: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with rotated and inverted object images.
    Besken M; Solmaz EC; Karaca M; Atılgan N
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):906-922. PubMed ID: 30790210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effect of motoric fluency on metamemory.
    Susser JA; Mulligan NW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25413684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does word frequency influence judgments of learning (JOLs)? A meta-analytic review.
    Fiacconi CM; Dollois MA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Dec; 74(4):346-353. PubMed ID: 32191049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Processing fluency mediates the influence of perceptual information on monitoring learning of educationally relevant materials.
    Ball BH; Klein KN; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Dec; 20(4):336-48. PubMed ID: 25347408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall.
    Hourihan KL; Fraundorf SH; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):121-136. PubMed ID: 27527533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning.
    Mueller ML; Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 23188739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cue integration in metamemory judgements is strategic.
    Undorf M; Bröder A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):629-642. PubMed ID: 31561744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Metamemory viewed through the judgment lens.
    Bröder A; Undorf M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():153-165. PubMed ID: 31158737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Is all metamemory monitoring spared from aging? A dual-process examination.
    Kuhlmann BG; Undorf M
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Dec; 33(8):1152-1167. PubMed ID: 30550332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):743-765. PubMed ID: 36521154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Generating lies produces lower memory predictions and higher memory performance than telling the truth: Evidence for a metacognitive illusion.
    Besken M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):465-484. PubMed ID: 28933907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Sun B; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):384-397. PubMed ID: 29164524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
    Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Perceptual span is independent of font size for older and young readers: Evidence from Chinese.
    Xie F; Wang J; Hao L; Zhang X; Warrington KL
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Nov; 35(7):1026-1040. PubMed ID: 32584070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Higher judgements of learning for emotional words: processing fluency or memory beliefs?
    Pierce BH; McCain JL; Stevens AR; Frank DJ
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):714-730. PubMed ID: 37021706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.