These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29698534)
21. Positron emission tomography for radiation treatment planning. Grosu AL; Piert M; Weber WA; Jeremic B; Picchio M; Schratzenstaller U; Zimmermann FB; Schwaiger M; Molls M Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Aug; 181(8):483-99. PubMed ID: 16044216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy of bladder cancer by image-based tumour control probability modelling. Wright P; Muren LP; Høyer M; Malinen E Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1045-51. PubMed ID: 20831494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dealing with geometric uncertainties in dose painting by numbers: introducing the ΔVH. Witte M; Shakirin G; Houweling A; Peulen H; van Herk M Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 21937139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. Castadot P; Lee JA; Parraga A; Geets X; Macq B; Grégoire V Radiother Oncol; 2008 Oct; 89(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18501456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of statistical uncertainties on Monte Carlo treatment planning. Ma CM; Li JS; Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Xiong W; Qin LH; Yang J Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):891-907. PubMed ID: 15798263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance variations among clinically available deformable image registration tools in adaptive radiotherapy - how should we evaluate and interpret the result? Nie K; Pouliot J; Smith E; Chuang C J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):328-340. PubMed ID: 27074457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A novel surrogate to identify anatomical changes during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients. Gros SA; Xu W; Roeske JC; Choi M; Emami B; Surucu M Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):924-934. PubMed ID: 28019647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Probability dynamics of a repopulating tumor in case of fractionated external radiotherapy. Stavreva N; Stavrev P; Fallone BG Phys Med; 2009 Dec; 25(4):181-91. PubMed ID: 19345599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A dynamic supraclavicular field-matching technique for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT. Duan J; Shen S; Spencer SA; Ahmed RS; Popple RA; Ye SJ; Brezovich IA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):959-72. PubMed ID: 15465215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. EUD-based biological optimization for carbon ion therapy. Brüningk SC; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6248-57. PubMed ID: 26520717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimization of tumour control probability in hypoxic tumours by radiation dose redistribution: a modelling study. Søvik A; Malinen E; Bruland ØS; Bentzen SM; Olsen DR Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):499-513. PubMed ID: 17202629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A voxel-based multiscale model to simulate the radiation response of hypoxic tumors. Espinoza I; Peschke P; Karger CP Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 25563250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiobiological impact of dose calculation algorithms on biologically optimized IMRT lung stereotactic body radiation therapy plans. Liang X; Penagaricano J; Zheng D; Morrill S; Zhang X; Corry P; Griffin RJ; Han EY; Hardee M; Ratanatharathom V Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 11():10. PubMed ID: 26800883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impacts of dental filling materials on RapidArc treatment planning and dose delivery: challenges and solution. Mail N; Albarakati Y; Ahmad Khan M; Saeedi F; Safadi N; Al-Ghamdi S; Saoudi A Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081714. PubMed ID: 23927311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of MVCT protocols for brain and head and neck tumor patients treated with helical tomotherapy. Vaandering A; Lee JA; Renard L; Grégoire V Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 19515441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of dose distribution for head and neck cancer patients with and without dose painting escalation during radiotherapy realized with tomotherapy unit. Skorska M; Piotrowski T; Ryczkowski A Br J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 90(1075):20170019. PubMed ID: 28555505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Quantitative and qualitative investigations of salivary gland function in dependence on irradiation dose and volume for reduction of xerostomia in patients with head-and-neck cancer]. Kuhnt T; Jirsak N; Müller AC; Pelz T; Gernhardt C; Schaller HG; Janich M; Gerlach R; Dunst J Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Aug; 181(8):520-8. PubMed ID: 16044220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]