These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29698914)

  • 1. Error quantification of osteometric data in forensic anthropology.
    Langley NR; Meadows Jantz L; McNulty S; Maijanen H; Ousley SD; Jantz RL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jun; 287():183-189. PubMed ID: 29698914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data for validation of osteometric methods in forensic anthropology.
    Langley NR; Jantz LM; McNulty S; Maijanen H; Ousley SD; Jantz RL
    Data Brief; 2018 Aug; 19():21-28. PubMed ID: 29892612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver variation of selected postcranial skeletal measurements.
    Adams BJ; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Nov; 47(6):1193-202. PubMed ID: 12455639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reliability of virtual femur measurement from CT scan.
    Ismail NA; Abdullah N; Mohamad Noor MH; Lai PS; Shafie MS; Nor FM
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Apr; 63():11-17. PubMed ID: 30825771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images.
    Stull KE; Tise ML; Ali Z; Fowler DR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():133-40. PubMed ID: 24713466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement standards for human metacarpals.
    Case DT; Rawlins CM; Mick CB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2015 Jun; 157(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 25639619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardized anthropological measurement of postcranial bones using three-dimensional models in CAD software.
    Reynolds MS; MacGregor DM; Barry MD; Lottering N; Schmutz B; Wilson LJ; Meredith M; Gregory LS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():381-387. PubMed ID: 28810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of Three Commonly Used Tibia Length Measurement Techniques.
    Lynch JJ; Maijanen H; Prescher A
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):181-185. PubMed ID: 30001468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardization and quality assurance in skeletal landmark placement and osteometry.
    Liebenberg L; Krüger GC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Mar; 308():110168. PubMed ID: 32006879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How reproducibly can human ear ossicles be measured? A study of inter-observer error.
    Flohr S; Leckelt J; Kierdorf U; Kierdorf H
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2010 Dec; 293(12):2094-106. PubMed ID: 21046668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The subpubic angle in sex determination: anthropometric measurements and analyses on Anatolian Caucasians using multidetector computed tomography datasets.
    Karakas HM; Harma A; Alicioglu B
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1004-9. PubMed ID: 24237808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error measurement in craniometrics: The comparative performance of four popular assessment methods using 2000 simulated cranial length datasets (g-op).
    Fancourt HSM; Stephan CN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():162-171. PubMed ID: 29501053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistency of selected craniometric landmark locations and the resulting variation in measurements.
    Smith AC; Boaks A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():156-163. PubMed ID: 29055251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining Interobserver Reliability of Metric and Morphoscopic Characteristics of the Mandible.
    Byrnes JF; Kenyhercz MW; Berg GE
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):981-985. PubMed ID: 27982434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of the repeatability of pubic and ischial measurements.
    Steyn M; Becker PJ; L'Abbé EN; Scholtz Y; Myburgh J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):210.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21871745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraobserver Error in Macromorphoscopic Trait Data,
    Kamnikar KR; Plemons AM; Hefner JT
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28542737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating error in saw mark minimum kerf width measurements.
    VanBaarle AL; Garvin HM
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jan; 68(1):257-266. PubMed ID: 36411482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver errors in anthropometry.
    Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Tsuzuki K; Yokoi T
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1999 Dec; 28(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 11957319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
    Valentin L; Bergelin I
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 12230448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observer error and its impact on ancestry estimation using dental morphology.
    Pilloud MA; Adams DM; Hefner JT
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 May; 133(3):949-962. PubMed ID: 30564914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.