These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29699051)

  • 1. [Risk on bias assessment: (6) A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment on Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2)].
    Qu YJ; Yang ZR; Sun F; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 39(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 29699051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality assessment of comparative diagnostic accuracy studies: our experience using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool.
    Wade R; Corbett M; Eastwood A
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26053845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [QUADAS-C-A tool for assessing risk of bias regarding Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-Comparative].
    Yang QY; Lu Y; Xie XL; Lai HH; Tian C; Niu M; Tian JH; Li N; Li J; Ge L
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 43(6):938-944. PubMed ID: 35725353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
    Yang B; Mallett S; Takwoingi Y; Davenport CF; Hyde CJ; Whiting PF; Deeks JJ; Leeflang MMG; ; Bossuyt PMM; Brazzelli MG; Dinnes J; Gurusamy KS; Jones HE; Lange S; Langendam MW; Macaskill P; McInnes MDF; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AWS; Sinclair A; de Vet HCW; Virgili G; Wade R; Westwood ME
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 Nov; 174(11):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 34698503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Dinnes J; Reitsma J; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(25):iii, 1-234. PubMed ID: 15193208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological quality of test accuracy studies included in systematic reviews in obstetrics and gynaecology: sources of bias.
    Morris RK; Selman TJ; Zamora J; Khan KS
    BMC Womens Health; 2011 Mar; 11():7. PubMed ID: 21426545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using AI (QUADAS-AI): Protocol for a Qualitative Study.
    Guni A; Sounderajah V; Whiting P; Bossuyt P; Darzi A; Ashrafian H
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Sep; 13():e58202. PubMed ID: 39293047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological quality of diagnostic accuracy studies on non-invasive coronary CT angiography: influence of QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies included in systematic reviews) items on sensitivity and specificity.
    Schueler S; Walther S; Schuetz GM; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1603-22. PubMed ID: 23322410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting PF; Rutjes AW; Westwood ME; Mallett S; Deeks JJ; Reitsma JB; Leeflang MM; Sterne JA; Bossuyt PM;
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):529-36. PubMed ID: 22007046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. QUAPAS: An Adaptation of the QUADAS-2 Tool to Assess Prognostic Accuracy Studies.
    Lee J; Mulder F; Leeflang M; Wolff R; Whiting P; Bossuyt PM
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Jul; 175(7):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 35696685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.
    Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
    Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Vali Y; Leeflang MMG; Bossuyt PMM
    Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 10(1):191. PubMed ID: 34174958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The methodological quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies for musculoskeletal conditions can be improved.
    Henschke N; Keuerleber J; Ferreira M; Maher CG; Verhagen AP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 24581295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
    Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.
    Di Girolamo N; Winter A; Meursinge Reynders R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():73-78. PubMed ID: 29777798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the methodological quality of studies of the performance of diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis using QUADAS.
    Downs SH; More SJ; Goodchild AV; Whelan AO; Abernethy DA; Broughan JM; Cameron A; Cook AJ; Ricardo de la Rua-Domenech R; Greiner M; Gunn J; Nuñez-Garcia J; Rhodes S; Rolfe S; Sharp M; Upton P; Watson E; Welsh M; Woolliams JA; Clifton-Hadley RS; Parry JE
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 May; 153():108-116. PubMed ID: 28392087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study.
    Ochodo EA; van Enst WA; Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; Hooft L; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Mar; 14():33. PubMed ID: 24588874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assessment of diagnostic before-after studies: development of methodology in the context of a systematic review.
    Meads CA; Davenport CF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():3. PubMed ID: 19152699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of the QUADAS-2 in Assessing Risk of Bias in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
    Venazzi A; Swardfager W; Lam B; Siqueira JO; Herrmann N; Cogo-Moreira H
    Front Psychiatry; 2018; 9():221. PubMed ID: 29887812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the quality of diagnostic studies using psychometric instruments: applying QUADAS.
    Mann R; Hewitt CE; Gilbody SM
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 44(4):300-7. PubMed ID: 18836883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.