These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29699425)

  • 21. Performance of a reagent strip device for quantitation of the urine albumin: creatinine ratio in a point of care setting.
    Parsons M; Newman DJ; Pugia M; Newall RG; Price CP
    Clin Nephrol; 1999 Apr; 51(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 10230554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity of HydraTrend reagent strips for the assessment of hydration status.
    Abbey BM; Heelan KA; Brown GA; Bartee RT
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2634-9. PubMed ID: 24552790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identification of contaminant interferences which cause positive urine reagent test strip reactions in a cage setting for the laboratory-housed nonhuman primate, Beagle dog, and Sprague-Dawley rat.
    Siska WD; Meyer DJ; Schultze AE; Brandoff C
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Mar; 46(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 28295488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of urine pH on accurate urinary protein determination in Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Reagan WJ; VanderLind B; Shearer A; Botts S
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2007 Mar; 36(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 17311198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role, Cost, and Availably of Urinary pH Monitoring for Kidney Stone Disease-A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Sanz-Gómez I; Angerri O; Baboudjian M; Kanashiro A; Gracia S; Millán F; Sánchez-Martín F; Somani B; Galan-Llopis JA; Barghouthy Y; Emiliani E
    Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Aug; 24(8):381-388. PubMed ID: 37314611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Point-of-care image-based quantitative urinalysis with commercial reagent strips: Design and clinical evaluation.
    Tohl D; Tran Tam Pham A; Li J; Tang Y
    Methods; 2024 Apr; 224():63-70. PubMed ID: 38367653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Urinary pH relevance on urolithiasis management.].
    Kanashiro A; Angerri O
    Arch Esp Urol; 2021 Jan; 74(1):102-111. PubMed ID: 33459626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of a solid-phase reagent for urinary specific gravity determination.
    Chu SY; Sparks D
    Clin Biochem; 1984 Feb; 17(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 6705188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simplified and quantitative saliva buffer capacity test using a hand-held pH meter.
    Kitasako Y; Moritsuka M; Foxton RM; Ikeda M; Tagami J; Nomura S
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 16158802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of urinary dipstick testing for pH manipulation therapy.
    Desai RA; Assimos DG
    J Endourol; 2008 Jun; 22(6):1367-70. PubMed ID: 18578664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Nova StatSensor creatinine meter and reagent strip technology for whole blood testing.
    Schnabl KL; Bagherpoor S; Diker P; Cursio C; Dubois J; Yip PM
    Clin Biochem; 2010 Aug; 43(12):1026-9. PubMed ID: 20416292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fasting and 24-h urine pH in patients with urolithiasis using potassium citrate.
    da Silva IBL; Amaro CP; Amaro JL; Cunha NB; Callegari MA; Yamamoto HA; Guerra R; Quitzan JG; Reis LO; Kawano PR
    Am J Clin Exp Urol; 2022; 10(3):188-193. PubMed ID: 35874289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Urinary specific gravity--comparative measurements using reagent strips and refractometer in 340 morning urine samples].
    Siegrist D; Hess B; Montandon M; Takkinen R; Lippuner K; Jaeger P
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1993 Jan; 82(4):112-6. PubMed ID: 8434200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantitative evaluation of urinalysis test strips.
    Penders J; Fiers T; Delanghe JR
    Clin Chem; 2002 Dec; 48(12):2236-41. PubMed ID: 12446482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating the validity of blood glucose monitoring strip interpretation by experienced users.
    Wakefield B; Wakefield DS; Booth BM
    Appl Nurs Res; 1992 Feb; 5(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 1570952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Urine reagent strips: an MDA evaluation.
    Halloran S; Bennitt W
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Aug; 14(11):791-6. PubMed ID: 10481710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ward and laboratory assessment of two second-generation blood-glucose monitoring systems.
    Stuart S; Beng C
    Med J Aust; 1988 Oct; 149(8):420-4. PubMed ID: 3173204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [USING URINARY STRIPS].
    Barbeito García A; Sampayo Montenegro A
    Rev Enferm; 2015 Oct; 38(10):10-6. PubMed ID: 26685561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Technical note: Evaluation of a continuous ruminal pH measurement system for use in noncannulated small ruminants.
    Penner GB; Aschenbach JR; Gäbel G; Oba M
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2363-6. PubMed ID: 19329478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of pleural fluid pH values obtained using blood gas machine, pH meter, and pH indicator strip.
    Cheng DS; Rodriguez RM; Rogers J; Wagster M; Starnes DL; Light RW
    Chest; 1998 Nov; 114(5):1368-72. PubMed ID: 9824016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.