These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29699446)

  • 1. Learning in the Target Prevalence Effect.
    Hon N; Jabar SB
    Perception; 2018 Jul; 47(7):789-798. PubMed ID: 29699446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rare targets are less susceptible to attention capture once detection has begun.
    Hon N; Ng G; Chan G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 26335411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased experience amplifies the activation of task-irrelevant category representations.
    Wu R; Pruitt Z; Zinszer BD; Cheung OS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):522-532. PubMed ID: 27981522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Location probability learning requires focal attention.
    Kabata T; Yokoyama T; Noguchi Y; Kita S
    Perception; 2014; 43(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 25109022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constructing representations of spatial location from briefly presented displays.
    Gunzelmann G; Lyon DR
    Cogn Process; 2017 Feb; 18(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 27465806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional prioritizations based on spatial probabilities can be maintained on multiple moving objects.
    Feria CS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):926-38. PubMed ID: 20436190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Losing the trees for the forest in dynamic visual search.
    Jardine NL; Moore CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):617-30. PubMed ID: 26689307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pure perceptual-based learning of second-, third-, and fourth-order sequential probabilities.
    Remillard G
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jul; 75(4):307-23. PubMed ID: 20842376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.
    Lungu OV; Wächter T; Liu T; Willingham DT; Ashe J
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 159(2):135-50. PubMed ID: 15258712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of spatial and feature probability cuing in visual search.
    Schwark J; Dolgov I
    Perception; 2013; 42(4):470-2. PubMed ID: 23866559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision processes in visual search as a function of target prevalence.
    Peltier C; Becker MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1466-76. PubMed ID: 27149294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual load improves the expression but not learning of relevant sequence information.
    Deroost N; Coomans D; Soetens E
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 19261583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of target probability and memory demands on the vigilance of adults with and without mental retardation.
    Tomporowski PD; Tinsley V
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 May; 98(6):688-703. PubMed ID: 8054198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search for conjunctions of physical and numerical size shows that they are processed independently.
    Sobel KV; Puri AM; Faulkenberry TJ; Dague TD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):444-453. PubMed ID: 27893271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulated central vision loss impairs implicit location probability learning.
    Addleman DA; Legge GE; Jiang YV
    Cortex; 2021 May; 138():241-252. PubMed ID: 33735796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.
    Moores E; Laiti L; Chelazzi L
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 6(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12514738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention capture without awareness in a non-spatial selection task.
    Oriet C; Pandey M; Kawahara JI
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Feb; 48():117-128. PubMed ID: 27866004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes.
    Yang CT; Chang TY; Wu CJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1365-85. PubMed ID: 23148473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.
    Caddigan E; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):9. PubMed ID: 21135256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.