567 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29702019)
1. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preserving image texture while reducing radiation dose with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in chest CT: A phantom study.
Franck C; Zhang G; Deak P; Zanca F
Phys Med; 2021 Jan; 81():86-93. PubMed ID: 33445125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: A phantom study.
Racine D; Becce F; Viry A; Monnin P; Thomsen B; Verdun FR; Rotzinger DC
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():28-37. PubMed ID: 32574999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction - a phantom study.
Dodge CT; Tamm EP; Cody DD; Liu X; Jensen CT; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):511-531. PubMed ID: 27074454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of radiation dose and image quality of computed tomography images using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Hussain FA; Mail N; Shamy AM; Suliman A; Saoudi A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 27167261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions.
Goodenberger MH; Wagner-Bartak NA; Gupta S; Liu X; Yap RQ; Sun J; Tamm EP; Jensen CT
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 28806318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography imaging with the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) algorithm: dependence of image quality on the blending level of reconstruction.
Barca P; Giannelli M; Fantacci ME; Caramella D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):463-473. PubMed ID: 29737491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
Samei E; Richard S
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detectability of Small Low-Attenuation Lesions With Deep Learning CT Image Reconstruction: A 24-Reader Phantom Study.
Toia GV; Zamora DA; Singleton M; Liu A; Tan E; Leng S; Shuman WP; Kanal KM; Mileto A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):283-295. PubMed ID: 36129222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).
Vachha B; Brodoefel H; Wilcox C; Hackney DB; Moonis G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2222-6. PubMed ID: 24016832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose reduction with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for paediatric CT: phantom study and clinical experience on chest and abdomen CT.
Gay F; Pavia Y; Pierrat N; Lasalle S; Neuenschwander S; Brisse HJ
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 23995879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Liver Phantom Study: CT Radiation Dose Reduction and Different Image Reconstruction Algorithms Affect Diagnostic Quality.
Brænne KR; Flinder LI; Almenning Martiniussen M; Jensen K; Reisse CH; Julsrud L; Martinsen AC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):735-9. PubMed ID: 27224229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
