568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29702019)
21. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative analysis of the effect of iterative reconstruction using a phantom: determining the appropriate blending percentage.
Kim HG; Chung YE; Lee YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ; Kim KW
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jan; 56(1):253-61. PubMed ID: 25510772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction ASiR-V: Assessment of noise performance in comparison to ASiR.
De Marco P; Origgi D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):275-286. PubMed ID: 29363260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses.
Yoon MA; Kim SH; Lee JM; Woo HS; Lee ES; Ahn SJ; Han JK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 22992612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Solomon J; Marin D; Roy Choudhury K; Patel B; Samei E
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):777-787. PubMed ID: 28170300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for computed tomography of the spine.
Tsuda M; Yunaga H; Murakami A; Yata S
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):768-772. PubMed ID: 33384207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.
Shuman WP; Green DE; Busey JM; Kolokythas O; Mitsumori LM; Koprowicz KM; Thibault JB; Hsieh J; Alessio AM; Choi E; Kinahan PE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 23617492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Image texture, low contrast liver lesion detectability and impact on dose: Deep learning algorithm compared to partial model-based iterative reconstruction.
Racine D; Brat HG; Dufour B; Steity JM; Hussenot M; Rizk B; Fournier D; Zanca F
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109808. PubMed ID: 34120010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study.
Greffier J; Hamard A; Pereira F; Barrau C; Pasquier H; Beregi JP; Frandon J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3951-3959. PubMed ID: 32100091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT.
Jia Y; Zhai B; He T; Yu Y; Yu N; Duan H; Yang C; Zhang X
Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e275-e283. PubMed ID: 30660470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for abdominal CT protocols in obese patients: assessment of image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability in a phantom.
Schindera ST; Odedra D; Mercer D; Thipphavong S; Chou P; Szucs-Farkas Z; Rogalla P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):W146-52. PubMed ID: 24450696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Upgrade to iterative image reconstruction (IR) in MDCT imaging: a clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction environment (ASIR) Part2: The chest.
Mueck FG; Michael L; Deak Z; Scherr MK; Maxien D; Geyer LL; Reiser M; Wirth S
Rofo; 2013 Jul; 185(7):644-54. PubMed ID: 23696019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy spectral CT imaging: A phantom study.
Li H; Li Z; Gao S; Hu J; Yang Z; Peng Y; Sun J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2024; 32(3):513-528. PubMed ID: 38393883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Kambadakone AR; Chaudhary NA; Desai GS; Nguyen DD; Kulkarni NM; Sahani DV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):W743-52. PubMed ID: 21606263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Low contrast detectability and spatial resolution with model-based Iterative reconstructions of MDCT images: a phantom and cadaveric study.
Millon D; Vlassenbroek A; Van Maanen AG; Cambier SE; Coche EE
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):927-937. PubMed ID: 27300195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Gilman MD; Hsieh J; Pien HH; Digumarthy SR; Shepard JA
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):565-73. PubMed ID: 21386048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Mise Y; Sumida K; Abe O
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
