These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29702612)

  • 1. How Well Do COP22 Attendees Understand Graphs on Climate Change Health Impacts from the Fifth IPCC Assessment Report?
    Fischer H; Schütte S; Depoux A; Amelung D; Sauerborn R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 29702612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. United Nations Climate Change Conferences: COP21 a lost opportunity for asthma and allergies and preparing for COP22.
    Annesi-Maesano I
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2016 Jul; 138(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 27373326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. COP negotiations and Malaysian climate change roadmap: a comparative assessment using a dynamic environmental model.
    Ahmed A; Al-Amin AQ; Rasiah R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(29):30003-30015. PubMed ID: 31414393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
    Budescu DV; Broomell S; Por HH
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Mar; 20(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 19207697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "reasons for concern".
    Smith JB; Schneider SH; Oppenheimer M; Yohe GW; Hare W; Mastrandrea MD; Patwardhan A; Burton I; Corfee-Morlot J; Magadza CH; Füssel HM; Pittock AB; Rahman A; Suarez A; van Ypersele JP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Mar; 106(11):4133-7. PubMed ID: 19251662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Climate for women in climate science: Women scientists and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
    Gay-Antaki M; Liverman D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(9):2060-2065. PubMed ID: 29440422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends and gaps in climate change and health research in North America.
    Harper SL; Cunsolo A; Babujee A; Coggins S; De Jongh E; Rusnak T; Wright CJ; Domínguez Aguilar M
    Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111205. PubMed ID: 33961824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the treatment of risk and uncertainties in the IPCC reports on climate change.
    Aven T; Renn O
    Risk Anal; 2015 Apr; 35(4):701-12. PubMed ID: 25443439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rapid disintegration of projections: the West Antarctic Ice Sheet and the intergovernmental panel on climate change.
    O'Reilly J; Oreskes N; Oppenheimer M
    Soc Stud Sci; 2012 Oct; 42(5):709-31. PubMed ID: 23189611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction of the boundary between climate science and politics: the IPCC in the Japanese mass media, 1988-2007.
    Asayama S; Ishii A
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Feb; 23(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 23825249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controversy around climate change reports: a case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land.
    Sanford M; Painter J; Yasseri T; Lorimer J
    Clim Change; 2021; 167(3-4):59. PubMed ID: 34483407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communications in the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report cycle.
    Lynn J; Peeva N
    Clim Change; 2021; 169(1-2):18. PubMed ID: 34866716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multistage crucible of revision and approval shapes IPCC policymaker summaries.
    Mach KJ; Freeman PT; Mastrandrea MD; Field CB
    Sci Adv; 2016 Aug; 2(8):e1600421. PubMed ID: 27532046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contesting the 'national interest' and maintaining 'our lifestyle': a discursive analysis of political rhetoric around climate change.
    Kurz T; Augoustinos M; Crabb S
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 49(Pt 3):601-25. PubMed ID: 20163767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The climate debate: the facts].
    van den Broeke MR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():B511. PubMed ID: 20025793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracking the release of IPCC AR5 on Twitter: Users, comments, and sources following the release of the Working Group I Summary for Policymakers.
    Newman TP
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):815-825. PubMed ID: 26868025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Climate Change and Harmful Algal Blooms: Insights and perspective.
    Gobler CJ
    Harmful Algae; 2020 Jan; 91():101731. PubMed ID: 32057341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In science we trust? Public trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections and accepting anthropogenic climate change.
    Tranter B; Lester L; Foxwell-Norton K; Palmer MA
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Aug; 32(6):691-708. PubMed ID: 37194928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing rural community health risk assessments for climate change: a Tasmanian pilot study.
    Bell EJ; Turner P; Meinke H; Holbrook NJ
    Rural Remote Health; 2015; 15(3):3174. PubMed ID: 26394247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Has the IPCC's revised vulnerability concept been well adopted?
    Estoque RC; Ishtiaque A; Parajuli J; Athukorala D; Rabby YW; Ooba M
    Ambio; 2023 Feb; 52(2):376-389. PubMed ID: 36414854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.