These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29703261)
1. Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review. Jabran A; Peach C; Ren L Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Apr; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 29703261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of screw-based zones of a spatial subchondral support plate for proximal humerus fractures. Jabran A; Peach C; Zou Z; Ren L Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Mar; 233(3):372-382. PubMed ID: 30700217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri. Siffri PC; Peindl RD; Coley ER; Norton J; Connor PM; Kellam JF J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):547-54. PubMed ID: 16990726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of screw-based zoning of PHILOS and Fx proximal humerus plates. Jabran A; Peach C; Zou Z; Ren L BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jul; 19(1):253. PubMed ID: 30045716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hybrid blade and locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis. Jabran A; Peach C; Zou Z; Ren L Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Jan; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 29370867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. Röderer G; Scola A; Schmölz W; Gebhard F; Windolf M; Hofmann-Fliri L Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1327-32. PubMed ID: 23769470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to improve the biomechanical stability of endosteal augmentation for proximal humerus fracture with osteopenia? A cadaveric study. Zhu Z; Chang Z; Zhang W; Nie S; Qi L; Tang P; Chen H; Liu Y Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Jan; 101():105850. PubMed ID: 36493692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PEEK versus titanium locking plates for proximal humerus fracture fixation: a comparative biomechanical study in two- and three-part fractures. Schliemann B; Seifert R; Theisen C; Gehweiler D; Wähnert D; Schulze M; Raschke MJ; Weimann A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Jan; 137(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28005168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to enhance the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures? An overview of current biomechanical and clinical data. Schliemann B; Wähnert D; Theisen C; Herbort M; Kösters C; Raschke MJ; Weimann A Injury; 2015 Jul; 46(7):1207-14. PubMed ID: 25978864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screw augmentation reduces motion at the bone-implant interface: a biomechanical study of locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Schliemann B; Seifert R; Rosslenbroich SB; Theisen C; Wähnert D; Raschke MJ; Weimann A J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Dec; 24(12):1968-73. PubMed ID: 26255200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calcar screw position in proximal humerus fracture fixation: Don't miss high! Mehta S; Chin M; Sanville J; Namdari S; Hast MW Injury; 2018 Mar; 49(3):624-629. PubMed ID: 29452734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical study of Proximal humeral fracture fixation: Locking plate with medial support screw vs. locking plate with intramedullary fibular graft. Jang Y; Kim D Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Dec; 90():105510. PubMed ID: 34673363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques. Edwards SL; Wilson NA; Zhang LQ; Flores S; Merk BR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Oct; 88(10):2258-64. PubMed ID: 17015605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screws with larger core diameter and lower thread pitch increase the stability of locked plating in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures. Schliemann B; Risse N; Frank A; Müller M; Michel P; Raschke MJ; Katthagen JC Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Mar; 63():21-26. PubMed ID: 30784787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical effects of calcar screws and bone block augmentation on medial support in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures. Katthagen JC; Schwarze M; Meyer-Kobbe J; Voigt C; Hurschler C; Lill H Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Aug; 29(7):735-41. PubMed ID: 24997810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The mechanical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures. Zhang W; Zeng L; Liu Y; Pan Y; Zhang W; Zhang C; Zeng B; Chen Y PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e103297. PubMed ID: 25084520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone. O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effect of the configuration of screw hole style on locking plate fixation in proximal humerus fracture with a simulated gap: A finite element analysis. Zhang YK; Wei HW; Lin KP; Chen WC; Tsai CL; Lin KJ Injury; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1191-5. PubMed ID: 26975793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Theopold J; Schleifenbaum S; Müller M; Werner M; Hammer N; Josten C; Hepp P PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206349. PubMed ID: 30372476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]