These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29704157)

  • 1. Fast and effective: Intuitive processes in complex decisions.
    Brusovansky M; Glickman M; Usher M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1542-1548. PubMed ID: 29704157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural Signatures of Rational and Heuristic Choice Strategies: A Single Trial ERP Analysis.
    Wichary S; Magnuski M; Oleksy T; Brzezicka A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():401. PubMed ID: 28867996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Take-the-best and the influence of decision-inconsistent attributes on decision confidence and choices in memory-based decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1435-43. PubMed ID: 26642913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parallel constraint satisfaction in memory-based decisions.
    Glöckner A; Hodges SD
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(3):180-95. PubMed ID: 20705550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing psychologically plausible choice models.
    Heck DW; Hilbig BE; Moshagen M
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():26-40. PubMed ID: 28601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids: a critical analysis.
    Pieterse AH; de Vries M
    Health Expect; 2013 Sep; 16(3):e73-9. PubMed ID: 21902770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing.
    Glöckner A; Betsch T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1055-75. PubMed ID: 18763891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When one cue is not enough: combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U; Dieckmann A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1197-215. PubMed ID: 17676553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic activation of attribute knowledge in heuristic inference from memory.
    Khader PH; Pachur T; Jost K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 23132606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making.
    Bergert FB; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):107-29. PubMed ID: 17201556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics?
    Hicks EP; Kluemper GT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 21392683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategy selection in cue-based decision making.
    Bryant DJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 24884389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When to blink and when to think: preference for intuitive decisions results in faster and better tactical choices.
    Raab M; Laborde S
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Mar; 82(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 21462689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decisions among time saving options: when intuition is strong and wrong.
    Svenson O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 17936234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additional information is not ignored: New evidence for information integration and inhibition in take-the-best decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():167-84. PubMed ID: 26687019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of unconscious decision aids applied to complex patient-centered medical decisions.
    Manigault AW; Handley IM; Whillock SR
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e37. PubMed ID: 25677337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hierarchical Bayesian modeling approach to searching and stopping in multi-attribute judgment.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Moore CP; Lee MD; Newell BR
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1384-405. PubMed ID: 24646326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deciding to be authentic: Intuition is favored over deliberation when authenticity matters.
    Oktar K; Lombrozo T
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105021. PubMed ID: 35231768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast but not intuitive, slow but not reflective: Decision conflict drives reaction times in social dilemmas.
    Evans AM; Dillon KD; Rand DG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Oct; 144(5):951-66. PubMed ID: 26413891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
    Kruglanski AW; Gigerenzer G
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21244188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.