These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29704793)

  • 1. Lane change warning threshold based on driver perception characteristics.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Fu R; Li Z; Zhang Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():164-174. PubMed ID: 29704793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research on the Influence of Vehicle Speed on Safety Warning Algorithm: A Lane Change Warning System Case Study.
    Fu R; Zhang Y; Wang C; Yuan W; Guo Y; Ma Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 32397216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of gender, occupation and experience on behavior while driving on a freeway deceleration lane based on field operational test data.
    Lyu N; Cao Y; Wu C; Xu J; Xie L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():82-93. PubMed ID: 30237046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes.
    Calvi A; Benedetto A; De Blasiis MR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():195-203. PubMed ID: 22269501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
    Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system.
    Scanlon JM; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():59-65. PubMed ID: 27586104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A freeway vehicle early warning method based on risk map: Enhancing traffic safety through global perspective characterization of driving risk.
    Cui C; An B; Li L; Qu X; Manda H; Ran B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107611. PubMed ID: 38733809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing the effect of fog weather conditions on driver lane-keeping performance using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
    Das A; Ghasemzadeh A; Ahmed MM
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():71-80. PubMed ID: 30876522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential occupant injury reduction in the U.S. vehicle fleet for lane departure warning-equipped vehicles in single-vehicle crashes.
    Kusano K; Gorman TI; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S157-64. PubMed ID: 25307382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal safety evaluation of connected vehicles' platooning on expressways.
    Rahman MS; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():381-391. PubMed ID: 29275900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.