294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29705337)
21. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive midline lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Djurasovic M; Gum JL; Crawford CH; Owens K; Brown M; Steele P; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Sep; 32(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 31518977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A prospective study of lumbar facet arthroplasty in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis: cost-effective assessment from the Total Posterior Spine system (TOPS
Ament JD; Petros J; Zabehi T; Yee R; Johnson JP; Vokshoor A
Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1001-1014. PubMed ID: 38253290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-Utility Analysis of Instrumented Fusion Versus Decompression Alone for Grade I L4-L5 Spondylolisthesis at 1-Year Follow-up: A Pilot Study.
Alvin MD; Lubelski D; Abdullah KG; Whitmore RG; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):E80-6. PubMed ID: 26889996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A retrospective review comparing two-year patient-reported outcomes, costs, and healthcare resource utilization for TLIF vs. PLF for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Kim E; Chotai S; Stonko D; Wick J; Sielatycki A; Devin CJ
Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):661-669. PubMed ID: 28585094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: A STROBE-compliant observational study.
Zhang D; Mao K; Qiang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(37):e8011. PubMed ID: 28906383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
Goz V; Weinreb JH; Schwab F; Lafage V; Errico TJ
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 24333459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
