293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29705337)
41. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Kim JS; Kang BU; Lee SH; Jung B; Choi YG; Jeon SH; Lee HY
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19342933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Increased incidence of pseudarthrosis after unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spondylosis: Clinical article.
Gologorsky Y; Skovrlj B; Steinberger J; Moore M; Arginteanu M; Moore F; Steinberger A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 25084031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion In degenerative spondylolisthesis: An attempt to evaluate the superiority of one method over the other.
Ghasemi AA
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 150():1-5. PubMed ID: 27565009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A systematic review of clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Noorian S; Sorensen K; Cho W
Spine J; 2018 Aug; 18(8):1441-1454. PubMed ID: 29746966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Clinical study on lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Ren XJ; Chu TW; Wang WD; Zheng WJ; Pan Y; Huang B
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1076-80. PubMed ID: 22333446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Determination of the minimum improvement in pain, disability, and health state associated with cost-effectiveness: introduction of the concept of minimum cost-effective difference.
Parker SL; McGirt MJ
Neurosurgery; 2015 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S64-70. PubMed ID: 25692370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Determination of the minimum improvement in pain, disability, and health state associated with cost-effectiveness: introduction of the concept of minimum cost-effective difference.
Parker SL; McGirt MJ
Neurosurgery; 2012 Dec; 71(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 22986596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody, and Anterior/Posterior Fusion: Analysis of Fusion Outcomes and Costs.
Bozzio AE; Johnson CR; Fattor JA; Kleck CJ; Patel VV; Burger EL; Noshchenko A; Cain CMJ
Orthopedics; 2018 Sep; 41(5):e655-e662. PubMed ID: 30011051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.
Whitecloud TS; Roesch WW; Ricciardi JE
J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11285420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.
Tay KS; Bassi A; Yeo W; Yue WM
Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26515392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].
Sun X; Zeng R; Li G; Wei B; Hu Z; Lin H; Chen G; Chen S; Sun J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1504-9. PubMed ID: 27044219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Clinical and Patient-reported Outcomes After Posterior Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion-A Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study on 422 Patients with 2-year Follow-up.
Ohrt-Nissen S; Carreon LY; Andresen AK; Andersen MØ; Udby P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Jan; 47(2):180-185. PubMed ID: 34474454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
